MISSION AND VALUES OF COUNCIL

 

"A Sustainable Community that is inclusive, attractive, healthy and pleasant to live in, that uses our land so as to preserve our history and environment, respects the rights and equality of our citizens and manages our future growth wisely."

 

AGENDA

Business of an Urgent Nature

 

 

FOR THE

 

Ordinary Meeting of Council

 

15 October 2015

 


OUR VISION

 

"A thriving and friendly community that recognises our history and embraces cultural diversity and economic opportunity, whilst nurturing our unique natural and built environment."

 

OUR MISSION

 

“To deliver affordable and quality Local Government services.”

 

CORE VALUES OF THE SHIRE

 

The core values that underpin the achievement of the

 mission will be based on a strong customer service

focus and a positive attitude:

 

Communication

 

Integrity

 

Respect

 

Innovation

 

Transparency

 

Courtesy

 

DISCLAIMER

The purpose of Council Meetings is to discuss, and where possible, make resolutions about items appearing on the agenda.  Whilst Council has the power to resolve such items and may in fact, appear to have done so at the meeting, no person should rely on or act on the basis of such decision or on any advice or information provided by a Member or Officer, or on the content of any discussion occurring, during the course of the meeting.

 

Persons should be aware that the provisions of the Local Government Act 1995 (Section 5.25 (e)) establish procedures for revocation or rescission of a Council decision.  No person should rely on the decisions made by Council until formal advice of the Council decision is received by that person.  The Shire of Broome expressly disclaims liability for any loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on or acting on the basis of any resolution of Council, or any advice or information provided by a Member or Officer, or the content of any discussion occurring, during the course of the Council meeting.

  


AgendaOrdinary Meeting of Council 15 October 2015                                                                                 Page 3 of 8

 

SHIRE OF BROOME

Ordinary Meeting of Council

Thursday 15 October 2015

INDEX – Business of an Urgent Nature

 

12.            Business of an Urgent Nature. 4

12.2   BROOME GOLF CLUB - BUSINESS CASE PROPOSAL FOR REDEVELOPMENT FEASIBILITY STUDY. 4

12.3   MINUTES OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING HELD 13 OCTOBER 2015. 10

12.4   Shire of Broome Final Response to the Proposed Yawuru Nagulagun / Roebuck Bay Marine Park indicative joint management plan 2015 and the Yawuru Birragun Conservation Park draft management plan 2015. 134

12.6   Yawuru Conservation Estate - Draft Recreation Master Plan.. 609

 

 


AgendaOrdinary Meeting of Council 15 October 2015                                                                                 Page 6 of 8

 

12.       Business of an Urgent Nature

 

12.2       BROOME GOLF CLUB - BUSINESS CASE PROPOSAL FOR REDEVELOPMENT FEASIBILITY STUDY

LOCATION/ADDRESS:                            Reserve 29300 and Reserve 33592

APPLICANT:                                              BROOME GOLF CLUB

FILE:                                                           LSS022

AUTHOR:                                                   Property Administration Officer 

CONTRIBUTOR/S:                                    Asset & Building Coordinator

Manager Engineering Operations

RESPONSIBLE OFFICER:                          Director of Engineering Services

DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST:                     Nil

DATE OF REPORT:                                    26 November 2015

 

SUMMARY:

At the Ordinary Meeting of Council on 21 March 2013, Council resolved to enter into a lease agreement with The Broome Golf Club to lease a portion of Reserves 29300 and 33592 for the purpose of Recreation Golf Links, Club and Club Premises, for a length of term not exceeding 15 years with certain conditions to be met within the first 5 years relating to the development of the clubhouse.

The Broome Golf Club has submitted a ‘Business Case Proposal for Broome Golf Club – Club house redevelopment feasibility study and detailed design’ and requested a six year extension to their existing 15 year lease.

Although a lot of work has gone into preparing the Business Case, Officers consider the submitted business case is the first step towards meeting the lease conditions and recommend that Council advise the Broome Golf Club that more information is required to comply with current milestone lease conditions.

 

BACKGROUND

Previous Considerations

OMC May 2004 item 9.5.1

OMC March 2013 item 9.2.2

OMC April 2014 item 9.1.3

The Broome Golf Club Reserves (Reserve 33592 “Club and Club Premises”, Reserve 29300”Recreational-Golf Links”) are vested with the Shire of Broome and the Management Orders permit the Shire; subject to Ministerial approval to lease the reserves for a period up to a maximum of 21 years.

The initial lease was enacted 11 September 1992 and renewed on 12 September 2013; rent has remained constant through the duration of both leases at the peppercorn rate of $1.00 per annum. All outgoings for the lease are recouped from the Broome Golf Club and the Planned Maintenance Schedule is being followed.

At OMC 21 March 2013, Council resolved to enter into a lease agreement with The Broome Golf Club to lease a portion of Reserves 29300 and 33592 for the purpose of Recreation Golf Links, Club and Club Premises, for a length of term not exceeding 15 years. At this time Council resolved that as a condition of the lease the Broome Golf Club achieve the following milestones within the first 5 years:

a)  Development of detailed plans for the construction of new clubhouse, these plans to be independently costed

b)  Development of a funding strategy for construction of the new clubhouse. This would also need to include demonstrating attempting to secure funding or approaching financial institutions to secure loan facilities

c)  A detailed financial business plan outlining how loan commitments to support the construction of the facility will be achieved

These milestones would ensure that the Golf Club made reasonable efforts to redevelop the current Club House within an agreed timeframe.  These conditions were accepted as part of the lease agreement by the Golf Club.

In addition to the above, on 24 April 2014, Council consented to a License Agreement between the Broome Golf Club Incorporated as Licensor and Serenbear Pty Ltd as Licensee for a term of 15 years.

COMMENT

On 8 July 2015, the Broome Golf Club provided the Shire with a Business Case Proposal for Broome Golf Club – Club house redevelopment feasibility study and detailed design.  The Golf Club submitted the Business Case proposal to satisfy the milestone conditions of the lease.

The Business Case (attached at Appendix 1), is an application to seek funding to enable the Golf Club to meet the lease conditions resolved by Council.  The Business Case can be seen at the first step in attempting to meet the lease conditions.  However it is the view of Officers that the Business Case in itself does not meet the conditions imposed by Council, as detailed in the table below:- 

 

Lease condition

Comment and further requirements of next stage

Development of detailed plans for the construction of new clubhouse, these plans to be independently costed

The plans provided at this stage are conceptual and provide an overview of how the site could be redeveloped.

Further detailed plans will be required to be obtained and these would then be independently costed in order to meet the lease conditions. 

Development of a funding strategy for construction of the new clubhouse. This would also need to include demonstrating attempting to secure funding or approaching financial institutions to secure loan facilities

 

A funding strategy has been provided for the works required to undertake the next stage of the project development however no funding strategy has been provided to meet the capital and operational requirements of the clubhouse redevelopment.  It is presumed this will be achieved at the next stage of project development including approaching financial institutions. 

A detailed financial business plan outlining how loan commitments to support the construction of the facility will be achieved

 

This information is not part of the Business Case and it is presumed will be achieved during the next stage of the project development. 

Officers also consider that the provided business case proposal does not appear to have effectively engaged with all stakeholders and section 2.9 lists stakeholder identification as ‘To Be Confirmed’. Officers would like to see further stakeholder consultation be undertaken to identify opportunities and alternate concepts in relation to this redevelopment.  This may include plans for the development of more substantial options for the site including a convention centre. 

Options

In considering the request from the Golf Club for the implementation of a 21 year lease agreement, Council has the following options:

Option 1 – Advise the Broome Golf Club that the Business Case is considered to be a good first step in meeting the lease conditions regarding the redevelopment of the Clubhouse.  However Council would need to see further detail provided prior to determining that the current lease conditions are being met and before considering any new lease with a longer tenure.  In doing this Council would encourage the Broome Golf Club to continue to pursue the business case for the redevelopment of the Clubhouse within the remaining 3 years prior to the first 5 year milestone being achieved.  

In doing this Council could further encourage the Golf Club to investigate more significant redevelopment options on the site beyond what is currently being considered if it wanted to achieve this outcome. 

Option 2 – Determine that the Business Case meets the obligations of the 5 year milestone and the remaining 13 years of the lease continue.

Option 3 – Determine that the Business Case meets the obligations of the 5 year milestone and enter into a new 21 year with the Broome Golf Club.    This is the option requested by the Broome Golf Club.  If Council wanted to pursue this option it would also need to consider if it would consent to the sublease to Serenbear Pty Ltd for this similar period. 

Summary and Conclusion

Officers consider the Business Case supplied by the Broome Golf Club is a good first step towards meeting the milestones in the lease within the first 5 years however recommend Council choose Option 1 above.  Whilst the Business Case is sound it is only seeking funding to undertake the body of work Council wanted to see to meet the milestones of the lease.  The Broome Golf Club has a further 3 years to undertake this work to meet the milestone in the lease and given the work already undertaken Officers are confident this can be met. 

In addition to this Officers recommend that the Broome Golf Club undertake consultation with stakeholders to identify and determine the feasibility of any further scope for redevelopment on the site.

CONSULTATION

Manager, Broome Golf Club,

STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT

Local Government (Functions and General Regulations) 1996

30.        Dispositions of property to which section 3.58 of Act does not apply

(1)         A disposition that is described in this regulation as an exempt disposition is excluded from the application of section 3.58 of the Act.

(2)         A disposition of land is an exempt disposition if — 

(a)   the land is disposed of to an owner of adjoining land (in this paragraph called the transferee) and — 

(i)   its market value is less than $5 000; and

(ii)  the local government does not consider that ownership of the land would be of significant benefit to anyone other than the transferee;

(b)   the land is disposed of to a body, whether incorporated or not — 

(I)   the objects of which are of a charitable, benevolent, religious, cultural, educational, recreational, sporting or other like nature; and

(ii)  the members of which are not entitled or permitted to receive any pecuniary profit from the body’s transactions;

(c)   the land is disposed of to — 

(i)   the Crown in right of the State or the Commonwealth;

(ii)  a department, agency, or instrumentality of the Crown in right of the State or the Commonwealth; or

(iii) another local government or a regional local government;

(d)   it is the leasing of land to an employee of the local government for use as the employee’s residence;

(e)   it is the leasing of land for a period of less than 2 years during all or any of which time the lease does not give the lessee the exclusive use of the land;

(f)    it is the leasing of land to a “medical practitioner” (as defined in section 3 of the Medical Act 1894) to be used for carrying on his or her medical practice; or

(g)   it is the leasing of residential property to a person.

(2a)      A disposition of property is an exempt disposition if the property is disposed of within 6 months after it has been —

(a)   put out to the highest bidder at public auction, in accordance with section 3.58(2)(a) of the Act, but either no bid is made or any bid made does not reach a reserve price fixed by the local government;

(b)   the subject of a public tender process called by the local government, in accordance with section 3.58(2)(b) of the Act, but either no tender is received or any tender received is unacceptable; or

(c)   the subject of Statewide public notice under section 3.59(4), and if the business plan referred to in that notice described the property concerned and gave details of the proposed disposition including —

(i)   the names of all other parties concerned;

(ii)  the consideration to be received by the local government for the disposition; and

(iii)    the market value of the disposition as ascertained by a valuation carried out not more than 12 months before the proposed disposition.

(2b)      Details (see section 3.58(4) of the Act) of a disposition of property under subregulation (2a) must be made available for public inspection for at least 12 months from the initial auction or tender, as the case requires.

(3)         A disposition of property other than land is an exempt disposition if — 

(a)   its market value is less than $20 000; or

(b)   it is disposed of as part of the consideration for other property that the local government is acquiring for a consideration the total value of which is not more, or worth more, than $50 000.

[Regulation 30 amended in Gazette 25 Feb 2000 p. 974‑5; 28 Apr 2000 p. 2041; 31 Mar 2005 p. 1055‑6.]

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

Nil

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

Officer’s support of the Club’s funding application regarding the proposed Clubhouse redevelopment feasibility study and detailed design.

When considering the further funding options for the Broome Golf Club redevelopment, Council need to recognise that funding from the Shire of Broome is not readily available in this financial year.

If following further stakeholder consultation, the Golf Club identifies opportunities and alternate concepts for more substantial options for the site including a convention centre, the Shire may be requested to provide funding towards the project. 

RISK

If Council agree that the Business Case meets the obligations of the 5 year milestone, there is a risk to the Shire that the Golf Club will not proceed with any significant redevelopment of the clubhouse.  The consequence of this is assessed as ‘Major’ and the likelihood is assessed as ‘Possible’, which results in a ‘High’ risk to the Shire.

The Golf Course site has been classified by the Department of Environment Regulation as ‘Possibly contaminated – investigations required’.  The Shire is currently investigating the extent of possible contamination on the Golf Course site.  These results of this investigation are not yet known, and as such this risk can not be assessed at this time.

If the Golf Club identify more substantial options for redevelopment on the site, then additional funding may be required from the Shire of Broome.  This risk is difficult to assess at this time.

STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS  

Our People Goal – Foster a community environment that is accessible, affordable, inclusive, healthy and safe:

Effective communication

Participation in recreational activity

High level social capital that increases community capacity

Our Place Goal – Help to protect the nature and built environment and cultural heritage of Broome whilst recognising the unique sense of the place:

Retention and expansion of Broome’s iconic tourism assets and reputation

Best practice asset management to optimise Shires’ infrastructure whilst minimising life cycle costs.

Our Prosperity Goal – Create the means to enable local jobs creation and lifestyle affordability for the current and future population:

Affordable and equitable services and infrastructure

Key economic development strategies for the Shire which are aligned to regional outcomes working through recognised planning and development groups/committees

 

 

VOTING REQUIREMENTS

Simple Majority

 

REPORT RECOMMENDATION:

That Council;

1.          Acknowledges that considerable effort has gone into the development of the Business Case provided by the Broome Golf Club. 

2.          Considers the Business Case represents a first step towards meeting the milestones identified in the lease, however Council would like to see further details which address the issues below prior to considering whether the milestone has been achieved or entertaining any new lease being entered into:

a)    Development of the concept plans into detailed design plans and these to be independently costed

b)    Development of a funding strategy for the new Clubhouse and demonstration of attempts to secure funding for the construction.

c)    A detailed financial business plan for the construction and operation of the facility.

3.       Requests the Chief Executive Officer to notify the Broome Golf Club of Council’s           recommendation to           undertake consultation with stakeholders to identify and   determine the feasibility of any further scope for redevelopment on the site.

 

Attachments

1.

Business Proposal - Broome Golf Club  (Confidential to Councillors and Directors Only)

This attachment is confidential in accordance with Section 5.23(2) of the Local Government Act 1995 section 5.23(2)((e)(ii)) as it contains “a matter that if disclosed, would reveal information that has a commercial value to a person, where the information is held by, or is about, a person other than the local government”.

  


AgendaOrdinary Meeting of Council 15 October 2015                                                                             Page 10 of 11

 

 

12.3       MINUTES OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING HELD 13 OCTOBER 2015

LOCATION/ADDRESS:                            Nil

APPLICANT:                                              Nil

FILE:                                                           FRE02

AUTHOR:                                                   Manager Financial Services 

CONTRIBUTOR/S:                                    Nil

RESPONSIBLE OFFICER:                          Director Corporate Services

DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST:                     Nil

DATE OF REPORT:                                    30 September 2015

 

SUMMARY:         This report presents to Council, the minutes of the Audit Committee Meeting held 13 October 2015 for receipt and endorsement of the Audit Committee’s recommendation for the following items:

1.   Appointment of Council’s auditor following expiry of the current Audit Agreement on 30 June 2015. Council is required to appoint an Auditor from 1 July 2015. The Request for Tender (RFT) 15/06 - Kimberley Councils Audit Tender 2015 closed on 23 September 2015 and the recommendation of the evaluation panel was endorsed by the Audit Committee and is now presented to Council to appoint a new auditor.

 

2.   Adoption of the 2014/2015 Annual Financial Report, the Auditor and Management reports, and the report prepared by the Chief Executive Officer for the financial year ended 30 June 2015. Council is also requested to endorse the proposed allocation of the operating surplus from 2014/2015.

 

BACKGROUND

 

REQUEST FOR TENDER 15/06 - KIMBERLEY COUNCILS AUDIT TENDER 2015

 

Previous Considerations

 

OMC 28 August 2014                        Item 10.2

OMC 2 June 2015                              Item 9.4.3

OMC 25 August 2015                        Item 12.1

 

At the Ordinary Meeting of Council held 25 August 2015 Council resolved:

 

3.   In accordance with regulation 16(a)(ii) of the Local Government (Audit) Regulations 1996 accepts the Audit Specifications and the Procurement Plan as attached in the Audit Committee minutes, as the tender process to be used to select and appoint a person to be an auditor for the Kimberley Councils jointly and/or severally with the Shires of Derby West Kimberley and Halls Creek for the financial years commencing 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2018.

                                                                                               (Absolute Majority Required)

 

The adopted audit tender procurement plan was adopted by Council via recommendation from the Audit Committee which contained the evaluation methodology. The evaluation methodology outlines the criteria and associated weighting which will be applied to the assessment of each tender submitted and detailed as follows:

 

EVALUATION METHODOLOGY

Criteria

Weighting

Lead Partners/Audit Managers experience and performance

25%

Depth of understanding of Local Government and the region

20%

Audit resources allocated

25%

Detailed and well-articulated audit plan

15%

Fees and control of fees

15%

 

The procurement plan outlined the timeframes which aim to complete the tender process by the end of October 2015. The evaluation report is attached to this report and a recommendation is made for consideration by Council.

 

ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT & AUDIT REPORT 2014/2015

 

Previous Considerations

 

Nil

 

Pursuant to Section 7.9 of the Local Government Act 1995 (the ‘Act’), an Auditor is required to examine the accounts and annual financial report submitted by a local government for audit. The Auditor is also required, by 31 December following the financial year to which the accounts and report relate, prepare a report thereon and forward a copy of that report to:

            

             (a) Mayor or President; and

             (b) The Chief Executive Officer; and

             (c) The Minister

 

Furthermore, in accordance with Regulation 10(4) of the Local Government (Audit) Regulations 1996, where it is considered appropriate to do so, the Auditor may prepare a Management Report to accompany the Auditor’s Report, which is also to be forwarded to the persons specified in Section 7.9 of the Act.

 

On finalisation of the Shire’s 2014/2015 final audit, the Auditors presented their initial findings to the Audit Committee for consideration at an informal briefing session held Wednesday 16 September 2015 which was attended by Councillors Graeme Campbell and Desiree Male.

 

The Audit Committee examined the reports of the auditor after receiving a report from the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) on the matters reported and:

 

·            Determine if any matters raised require action to be taken by the local government; and

·            Ensure that appropriate action is taken in respect of those matters.

 

The Audit Committee was also required to review a report prepared by the CEO on any actions taken in respect of any matters raised in the report of the auditor and presents the report to Council for adoption. A copy of the report is to be forwarded to the Minister prior to the end of the next financial year or 6 months after the last report prepared by the auditor is received, whichever is the latest in time.

 

2014/2015 Operating Result

 

An analysis of the 2014/2015 operating result is provided in this report and how it compares to the forecasted outcomes of the Shire’s adopted Integrated Planning and Reporting Framework. As a background, the 2014/2015 Annual Financial Report discloses the results of the second year of implementation of the newly legislated Integrated Planning and Reporting Framework. The plans contained in the framework provide funding strategies to ensure Council can meet its adopted strategic objectives, while maintaining and forecasting impacts on the Shire’s future financial sustainability.

 

As reported to Council in the two preceding years in regards to the 2012/2013 and 2013/2014 Annual Financial Reports, the Shire’s 2014/2015 Annual Budget process continued to place significant focus on a number of ‘informing strategies’.  As part of the budget finalisation it was still evident in the second year since the introduction of the integrated planning framework, that the desired allocations toward capital renewal outlined within the prepared Asset Management Plans are not being achieved. 

 

Effectively, the intended annual allocations to Capital Reserves were either not provided for in the 2014/2015 Annual Budget or; in some cases Capital Reserves drawn to enable Capital Works programs to be sufficiently funded.  This is not sustainable over the longer term, triggering a review of the 2013-2028 Long Term Financial Plan (LTFP) previously adopted by Council at the Ordinary Meeting of Council held 27 October 2013.

 

The draft 2015-2030 Shire of Broome Long Term Financial Plan was presented to Councillors at a workshop held on 6 February 2015, as a follow on from a two day workshop held on 14 and 15 November 2014. At these workshops, the draft Strategic Community Plan 2015-2025 and Corporate Business Plan 2015-2019 were presented, containing the results of the interim desktop review.

 

The Shire’s LTFP was reviewed with consideration for these revised documents. As part of this process a review was conducted to prioritise projects within the organisation’s financial capacity. The objective of the revised LTFP was to reduce the overall reliance on reserve funding and to prioritise the funding capacity for the forecasted expenditure detailed in the Shire’s proposed Capital Renewal program. Funding of renewal expenditure through municipal funds, provides for long term financial viability and there has been a focus on achieving an improved operating surplus.

 

The draft LTFP contained some key assumptions which included organisational savings of $1.4M and a dividend from Waste operations of approximately $1M to offset operations. The SCP and CBP were adopted at the SMC held 19 February 2015, including the organisational restructure which resulted in $1.8M savings in employee costs per annum. The savings identified in 2014/2015 have been carried through to the 2015/2016 financial year and are a one off event as a result of the management decisions implemented to ensure the long term financial sustainability of the Shire. The revised 2015-2030 LTFP was adopted by Council at the Special Meeting of Council (SMC) held 13 August 2015.

 

After consideration and endorsement by the Audit Committee at its meeting held 13 October 2015, Council is requested to consider and adopt the annual financial report.

 

COMMENT

 

REQUEST FOR TENDER 15/06 - KIMBERLEY COUNCILS AUDIT TENDER 2015

 

RFT 15/06 was advertised in the West Australian newspaper to invite submissions from 5 September 2015 and closed 4pm 23 September 2015. The tender submissions were opened in the presence of the Manager Financial Services and Manager Governance (Shire of Broome). A total of 10 submissions were received prior to the deadline and opened in the following order:

 

·    Byfields Pty Ltd

·    Butler Settineri (Audit) Pty Ltd

·    RSM Bird Cameron

·    Moore Stephens

·    Anderson Munro & Wyllie

·    William Buck

·    KPMG

·    MACLEOD Corporation Pty Ltd

·    Grant Thornton

·    AMD Chartered Accountants

 

An Evaluation Panel review meeting was held at the Shire of Broome on 25 September 2015 to review the submissions. This was attended by panel members:

 

·    Manager Financial Services (Shire of Broome)

·    Financial Services Manager (Shire of Halls Creek)

·    Manager Finance (Shire of Derby West Kimberley)

 

Additionally the meeting was attended by the Executive Manager Corporate Services (Shire of Derby/West Kimberley) to provide as a handover due to the pending departure of their Manager of Finance.

 

The attached confidential report discloses the individual evaluation scoring matrix of all submissions and provides a recommendation to Council as to the proposed tender submitter based on performance against the Audit Specifications and weighted criteria as was adopted in the tender procurement plan. Council is requested to consider the evaluation outcome as recommended by the Audit Committee to appoint the successful tenderer as Council’s auditor from 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2018 (3 years).

 

ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT & AUDIT REPORT 2014/2015

 

Chief Executive Officer’s Report to the Audit Committee

 

Following is the CEO’s report to the Audit Committee on matters arising from the audit and management reports. Extracts from the audit and management reports are indented in italics.

 

Audit Report

 

There were no matters of statutory non-compliance reported.

 

Management Report

 

The Auditor’s Management Report provides an overview of the approach undertaken in respect of the annual audit process and the associated outcomes of the audit. The Management Report also identifies any findings that, whilst generally not material in relation to the overall audit of the financial report, are considered relevant to the day to day operations of the Shire.

 

1.   Matters Identified

 

As part of the 2014/2015 final audit, the Auditor identified five areas in which further improvements to the Shire’s current processes and procedures could be considered for implementation. These areas have also been assigned a finding rating, as detailed in the following table:

 

Key To Ratings

 

The Ratings in this management letter are based on the audit team’s assessment of risks and concerns with respect to the probability and/or consequence of adverse outcomes if action is not taken. We give consideration to these potential adverse outcomes in the context of both quantitative impact (for example financial loss) and qualitative impact (for example inefficiency, non-compliance, poor service to the public or loss of public confidence).

 

Significant        - Those findings where there is potentially a significant risk to the entity should the finding not be addressed by the entity promptly. A significant rating could indicate the need for a modified audit opinion in the current year, or in a subsequent reporting period if not addressed. However even if the issue is not likely to impact the audit opinion, it should be addressed promptly.

 

Moderate        - Those findings which are of sufficient concern to warrant action being taken by the entity as soon as practicable.

 

Minor                - Those findings that are not of primary concern but still warrant action being taken.

 

Each item is specifically discussed within the Management Report, as appended to the 2014/2015 Annual Financial Report as attached to this report, along with the Shire’s management response. In terms of the management responses, appropriate actions are proposed to be implemented where required to address each of the findings.

 

2.   Internal Financial Controls

 

During the audit, the Auditor examined the design and implementation of the internal controls surrounding the accounting and financial control systems. The matters that relate to internal control have been identified and discussed in the matters identified in section 1 of the aforementioned Management Report (none identified).

 

3.   Audit Adjustments

 

Following the presentation of the Draft 2014/2015 Financial Report to the Auditor, officers actioned the following amendments that needed to be made:

 

·            Adjustment for the current and non-current annual leave and long service leave provision. The schedule had been updated and the provision calculated and the timing of processing the journal occurred post on-site audit.

·            Adjustment for the provision for doubtful rates debtors. The increase represented an immaterial value however, as officers are now basing the calculation of the provision on actual rates debts, rather than an arbitrary percentage, the journal was processed post on-site audit after due consideration was made to the list of outstanding rates debtors.

·            Adjustment for the revaluation of infrastructure and furniture and fittings. The delay of receipt of the final, signed valuation report from AARB resulted in the journal being processed post on-site audit to recognise the change in valuation.

 

These adjustments have no material affect on the Shire of Broome’s financial situation.

 

4.   Other Matters

 

There were no identified matters of fraud to report and there were no disagreements with management about significant accounting matters.

 

2014/2015 Operating Result

 

The year end operating surplus result for 2014/2015 occurred through a number of factors. This included initiating a number of management directives and reviews to realise organisational savings across the Shire. These include unspent materials and contracts across operating and capital activities/projects, leased staff housing and other expenses of $413K. Savings in utilities of $346K include anticipated increases in electricity utilities which did not occur as previously estimated and implementation of public open space strategies to reduce water usage. The organisational restructure and subsequent freeze on recruitment for the rest of the financial year resulted in additional savings of $248K. Interim rates have sourced additional rates revenue of $448K as developments have finalised, plus a review of non-rateable properties in the Shire’s database has resulted in additional $162K of back rates being raised for properties such as telecommunication towers, exempt properties with an expired exempt land use and new parcels not previously advised from Landgate.

 

However, these savings were offset by a number of shortfalls in some areas. These include user charges from fees and charges revenue including BRAC Ovals due to North West Expo being relocated and overall BRAC visitor usage being down, Civic Centre venue user charges, rent concession for the Magabala Books tenancy as granted by Council, subdivision engineering supervision charges, and sanitation general refuse. Statutory and regulatory fees, licences and fines revenue was down $62,000.

 

The year end result was also impacted by the recognition of the revaluation of the Shire’s infrastructure and furniture and fittings assets at fair value in accordance with regulation 17A of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996. This is the third and final stage of fair value revaluations with the cycle recommencing in the 2015/2016 financial year for the recognition of plant and equipment assets to be recognised at fair value.

 

The financial year ended 30 June 2015 resulted in the following carried forward operating surplus:

 

             $2,305,519       2015/2016 Budgeted brought forward operating surplus

             $1,133,125       2014/2015 Net Actual operating surplus

             $3,438,644       Total 2015/2016 Carried forward operating surplus

 

The 2015/2016 Annual Budget that was adopted at the Special Meeting of Council (SMC) held 13 August 2015, adopted an estimated brought forward operating surplus of $2,305,519. This was comprised of the following projects estimated to be carried forward for inclusion in the 2015/2016 Annual Budget:

 

Project/Activity Description

Allocation

Sanctuary Caravan Park Op Exp - Tourism & Area Promotion

10,000

Project - Heritage Style Guide - Op Exp - Other Culture

30,000

Youth Development Program ((Net Grant Funding of $15K)

10,000

Consultant – Trails Master Plan (Net Grant Funding of $25K)

15,000

BRAC Building Renewal – Dry – Hard Court (Net Grant Funding of $47,626)

47,874

Cable Beach Road East (south side) – At TAFE in existing Bus Bay

16,900

Amphitheatre Project Outlet Structure Renewal (Stage 1 & 2) Muni Funded

20,000

Rates Review

13,000

BRAC Website Development

12,000

Intranet Upgrade

95,000

Payroll System Upgrade

66,000

Town Beach Boat Ramp

8,500

Catalyse Research and Strategy

27,900

Lorrikeet Drive Extension

23,000

Archer Street Design

15,000

Infrastructure Fair Value

68,500

Morgan Road upgrade – final invoices

19,500

St John Ambulance – repairs from 14/15

17,000

Vehicle Renewal – Water truck – Hino

180,000

Vehicle Renewal – D-MAX Tilt Tray

12,066

Vehicle Renewal - - Squirrel

70,000

Prepaid 15/16 Financial Assistance Grants and Roads Grants

1,486,197

Unallocated Estimated Surplus

42,082

TOTAL

$2,305,519

 

The unallocated balance of $42,082 represents a provision for the estimated operating surplus pending end of year adjustments and audit were finalised after the adoption of the budget. The total carried forward operating surplus is $3,438,644, resulting in an actual unallocated net operating surplus of $1,175,207.

 

This report contains recommendations for Council’s consideration of the allocation of the $1,175,207 net actual operating surplus. It is proposed for this to be fully allocated against significant initiatives in the 2015/2016 Adopted Annual Budget identified to require loan funding by transferring the funds to the respective Reserve account.

 

The initiatives identified include:

 

Project/Activity Description

15/16 Total Expenditure

15/16 Loan Funding

Proposed Allocation

Chinatown Revitalisation - Cap Exp GL Code 1367402

11,700,000

1,700,000

388,000

Economic Development - KRO3 Building Upgrade GL Code 1482446

4,280,000

2,880,000

670,000

Plant & Equip Renewal/Replacement - Cap Exp - BRAC – Aquatic GL Code 117132

3,320,000

496,722

117,207

TOTAL

$19,300,000

$5,076,722

$1,175,207

 

A letter from the Department of Local Government and Communities dated 9 October 2015 was received via email on 13 October 2015, as advised and forwarded by the Shire of Broome’s auditor RSM Bird Cameron. The letter was tabled at the Audit Committee meeting held 13 October 2015 (as attached) which identified a matter regarding the disclosure of the fair value revaluation increments and decrements which is required to be disclosed separately for each asset class in accordance with Australian Accounting Standard 116 Property, Plant and Equipment. As the 2014/2015 report had already been audited, further advice from the Department confirmed that the amendments were required to be disclosed in the 2014/2015 comparative year within next year’s 2015/2016 Annual Financial Report.

 

Additionally, the Audit Committee requested that the Chief Executive Officer, as part of Council’s rates debt recovery process, table a report to the next meeting of the Audit Committee regarding details of outstanding property rates assessments greater than 2 years to ensure Council has been informed and to have assurance that Council’s adopted policy 2.1.3 Rates Debt Recovery has been properly applied.

 

CONSULTATION

 

Shire Derby West Kimberley

Shire Halls Creek

Department Local Government and Communities

 

STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT

 

Local Government Act 1995

 

Section 1.8 Statewide public notice

 

Where under this Act Statewide public notice of a matter is required to be given, section 1.7 applies except that the newspaper referred to in section 1.7(1)(a) is required to circulate generally throughout the State.

 

Section 3.57 Tenders for providing goods or services

 

(1)         A local government is required to invite tenders before it enters into a contract of a prescribed kind under which another person is to supply good or services.

(2)         Regulations may make provision about tenders

 

Division 2 — Appointment of auditors

 

7.2.    Audit

 

The accounts and annual financial report of a local government for each financial year are required to be audited by an auditor appointed by the local government.

 

7.3.    Appointment of auditors

 

(1)     A local government is to, from time to time whenever such an appointment is necessary or expedient, appoint* a person, on the recommendation of the audit committee, to be its auditor.

* Absolute majority required.

(2)     The local government may appoint one or more persons as its auditor.

(3)     The local government’s auditor is to be a person who is —

(a)        a registered company auditor; or

(b)        an approved auditor.

[Section 7.3 amended by No. 49 of 2004 s. 6.]

 

7.4.    Disqualified person not to be auditor

 

(1)     A person may not be appointed as a local government’s auditor if that person is a disqualified person.

(2)     In this section —

disqualified person means a person who —

(a)        is a councillor or an employee of the local government; or

(b)        is a person who is in debt for more than the prescribed amount to the local government for a period of more than 35 days after —

(i)      in the case of that part of the debt which is for a rate or service charge under Part 6, the date the rate notice was issued; or

(ii)     in the case of that part of the debt which is not for a rate or service charge, the date an account was rendered to the person by the local government;

         or

(c)        is an employee of, or a member of the governing body of, an entity of a kind prescribed for the purposes of this paragraph; or

(d)        is a member of a class of persons prescribed for the purposes of this subsection.

 

7.6.    Term of office of auditor

 

(1)     The appointment of a local government’s auditor is to have effect in respect of the audit of the accounts and annual financial report of the local government for a term of not more than 5 financial years, but an auditor is eligible for re‑appointment.

(2)     The appointment of an auditor of a local government ceases to have effect if — 

(a)        his or her registration as a registered company auditor is cancelled; or

(b)        his or her approval as an approved auditor is withdrawn; or

(c)        he or she dies; or

(d)        the auditor ceases to be qualified to hold office as auditor or becomes a disqualified person; or

(e)        the auditor resigns by notice in writing addressed to the local government; or

(f)          the appointment is terminated by the local government by notice in writing.

(3)     Where — 

(a)        the registration of a local government’s auditor as a registered company auditor is suspended; or

(b)        a local government’s auditor becomes unable or unwilling to carry out all or part of his or her duties,

the local government is to appoint* a person to conduct the audit or to complete that part of the audit which remains to be conducted, as the case requires.

* Absolute majority required.

 

Local Government (Audit) Regulations 1996

 

16.     Audit committee, functions of

An audit committee —

(a)     is to provide guidance and assistance to the local government —

(i)      as to the carrying out of its functions in relation to audits carried out under Part 7 of the Act; and

(ii)     as to the development of a process to be used to select and appoint a person to be an auditor;

and

(b)     may provide guidance and assistance to the local government as to —

(i)      matters to be audited; and

(ii)     the scope of audits; and

(iii)     its functions under Part 6 of the Act; and

(iv)    the carrying out of its functions relating to other audits and other matters related to financial management; and

(c)     is to review a report given to it by the CEO under regulation 17(3) (the CEO’s report) and is to —

(i)      report to the council the results of that review; and

(ii)     give a copy of the CEO’s report to the council.

 

Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996

 

Section 5 R14 Requirements for publicly inviting tenders

(1)         When regulation 11(1), 12 or 13 requires tenders to be publicly invited, Statewide public notice of the invitation is to be given.

 

(2)         If the CEO has, under regulation 23(4), prepared a list of acceptable tenderers, instead of giving Statewide public notice the CEO is required to give notice of the invitation to each acceptable tenderer listed.

 

(2a)      If a local government —

(a)        is required to invite a tender; or

(b)        not being required to invite a tender, decides to invite a tender, the local government must, before tenders are publicly invited, determine in writing the criteria for deciding which tender should be accepted.

 

(3)         The notice, whether under subregulation (1) or (2), is required to include —

(a)        a brief description of the goods or services required;

(b)        particulars identifying a person from whom more detailed information as to may be obtained;

(c)        information as to where and how tenders may be submitted; and

(d)        the date and time after which tenders cannot be submitted.

 

(4)     In subregulation (3)(b) a reference to detailed information includes a reference to —

(a)        such information as the local government decides should be disclosed to those interested in submitting a tender;

(b)        detailed specifications of the goods or services required;

(c)        the criteria for deciding which tender should be accepted;

(d)        whether or not the local government has decided to submit a tender; and

(e)        whether or not the CEO has decided to allow tenders to be submittedby facsimile or other electronic means, and if so, how tenders may so be submitted.

 

After a notice has been given under subregulation (1) or (2), a local government may vary the information referred to in subregulation (3) by taking reasonable steps to give each person who has sought copies of the tender documents or each acceptable tenderer, as the case may be, notice of the variation.

 

[Regulation 14 amended in Gazette 29 Jun 2001 p. 3130.]

 

Section 5 R15 Minimum time to be allowed for submitting tenders

 

(1)     If the notice is published in the newspaper as part of giving Statewide public notice,  the time specified in the notice as the time after which tenders cannot be submitted  has to be at least 14 days after the notice is first published in the newspaper as part of   giving Statewide public notice.

 

(2)     If the notice is given to a person listed as an acceptable tenderer, the time specified in  the notice as the time after which tenders cannot be submitted has to be at least 14 days after the notice is given.

 

Clause 2.4 The Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996, Part 4, Division 2, regulation 18, paragraph (2)

 

(1)     A tender that is submitted at a place, and within the time, specified in the invitation for tenders but that fails to comply with any other requirement specified in the invitation may be rejected without considering the merits of the tender.

 

6.4.        Financial report

(1)         A local government is to prepare an annual financial report for the preceding financial year and such other financial reports as are prescribed.

(2)         The financial report is to — 

(a)        be prepared and presented in the manner and form prescribed; and

(b)        contain the prescribed information.

(3)         By 30 September following each financial year or such extended time as the Minister allows, a local government is to submit to its auditor — 

(a)        the accounts of the local government, balanced up to the last day of the preceding financial year; and

(b)        the annual financial report of the local government for the preceding financial year.

 

7.9.        Audit to be conducted

(1)         An auditor is required to examine the accounts and annual financial report submitted for audit and, by the 31 December next following the financial year to which the accounts and report relate or such later date as may be prescribed, to prepare a report thereon and forward a copy of that report to — 

(a)        the mayor or president; and

(b)        the CEO of the local government; and

(c)        the Minister.

(2)         Without limiting the generality of subsection (1), where the auditor considers that — 

(a)        there is any error or deficiency in an account or financial report submitted for audit; or

(b)        any money paid from, or due to, any fund or account of a local government has been or may have been misapplied to purposes not authorised by law; or

(c)        there is a matter arising from the examination of the accounts and annual financial report that needs to be addressed by the local government, details of that error, deficiency, misapplication or matter, are to be included in the report by the auditor.

(3)         The Minister may direct the auditor of a local government to examine a particular aspect of the accounts and the annual financial report submitted for audit by that local government and to — 

(a)        prepare a report thereon; and

(b)        forward a copy of that report to the Minister,

             and that direction has effect according to its terms.

(4)         If the Minister considers it appropriate to do so, the Minister is to forward a copy of the report referred to in subsection (3), or part of that report, to the CEO of the local government to be dealt with under section 7.12A.

 

7.12A.   Duties of local government with respect to audits

(1)         A local government is to do everything in its power to —

(a)        assist the auditor of the local government to conduct an audit and carry out his or her other duties under this Act in respect of the local government; and

(b)        ensure that audits are conducted successfully and expeditiously.

(2)         Without limiting the generality of subsection (1), a local government is to meet with the auditor of the local government at least once in every year.

(3)         A local government is to examine the report of the auditor prepared under section 7.9(1), and any report prepared under section 7.9(3) forwarded to it, and is to —

(a)        determine if any matters raised by the report, or reports, require action to be taken by the local government; and

(b)        ensure that appropriate action is taken in respect of those matters.

(4)         A local government is to —

(a)        prepare a report on any actions under subsection (3) in respect of an audit conducted in respect of a financial year; and

(b)        forward a copy of that report to the Minister, by the end of the next financial year, or 6 months after the last report prepared under section 7.9 is received by the local government, whichever is the latest in time.

 

5.54.      Acceptance of annual reports

(1)         Subject to subsection (2), the annual report for a financial year is to be accepted* by the local government no later than 31 December after that financial year.

* Absolute majority required.

(2)         If the auditor’s report is not available in time for the annual report for a financial year to be accepted by 31 December after that financial year, the annual report is to be accepted by the local government no later than 2 months after the auditor’s report becomes available.

 

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

 

Policy 2.3.7 Purchasing

Policy 1.2.9 Local Regional Price Reference

2.1.1 - Materiality in Financial Reporting

2.1.4 - Significant Accounting Policies

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

The three Councils combined budgeted expenditure proposed for the 2015/2016 financial year for external audit services ranges between $90K to $120K per annum. The Shire of Broome has a total expenditure budget for all audit related expenses including external audit services and separate audits allocated to general ledger account code 22200 Audit Fees Op Exp - Other Governance of $45K for 2015/2016.

 

The proposed allocation of the surplus is based on the principle of reducing Council’s borrowings. The $1,175,207 unallocated 2014/2015 operating surplus is to be transferred to the respective reserve account to offset any significant loan funded initiatives budgeted for the 2015/2016 financial year.

 

In terms of materiality, the unallocated surplus amount represents a variance of 3% compared to budgeted operating revenue for 2014/2015 of $36,801,700 (excluding grants and contributions for assets and profit on sale of assets). This is 2% over the adopted threshold of 1% ($368,017) as per policy 2.1.1 Materiality in Financial Reporting.

 

RISK

 

The Kimberley Councils Audit Tender 2015 is a strategic outcome identified by the Kimberley Zone of WALGA Regional Collaborative Group. Its aim is to facilitate an increased level of collaboration between the member Councils of the Zone and achieve resource efficiencies. Should the recommendation of this report not be adopted, the risk of not achieving the above objective has been assessed at a high level, resulting in the Kimberley Zone and each member Council experiencing a possible likelihood of significant delays in appointing an auditor within the procurement deadlines to meet the February 2016 interim audit deadline. Additionally, it is a matter of legislative compliance for the Audit Committee to provide guidance and advice to Council on the appointment of Council’s auditors.

 

To mitigate this risk officers of the three Councils have ensured the evaluation process was conducted in a fair and transparent manner in full consultation with each participating Council. The evaluation report and templates were obtained from the Western Australia Local Government Association procurement handbook and resources which meet the minimum tender compliance requirements.

 

The audited Annual Financial Report is a key control measure used to report to Council and its stakeholders to provide assurance that all systems, processes and controls have been established by the CEO to minimise the risk of any material misstatement or loss caused by fraud or error. The audit findings indicate areas requiring improvement and management have implemented measures to review processes. The report measures Council’s financial capacity to achieve its adopted strategic and operational objectives. A material variance indicates areas requiring investigation such as budget estimation/formulation, workforce management and Council’s overall resource capacity to achieve its strategic objectives.

 

The recommendation by the Audit Committee to Council for the adoption of the Annual Financial Report, Audit and Management Report and CEO’s report is a key statutory compliance matter. Should this not be recommended for adoption, this will cause a delay in Council’s adoption of the 2014/2015 Annual Report to be presented at the October Ordinary Meeting of Council (OMC), which will flow on to delaying the Annual Electors Meeting (AEM). This poses a high risk due to the possible likelihood of occurring and the impact of a significant delay to major deliverables.

 

In regards to the proposed allocation of the 2014/2015 surplus, should Council make alternative recommendations, the long term financial impacts of such should be analysed to ensure there are no adverse impacts to Council’s future financial sustainability and should be in line with the adopted LTFP. Surplus funds are not recommended to be committed to ongoing operational programs and activities which will further reduce Council’s future ability to maintain optimal operating surpluses to fund capital renewal priorities as per the LTFP. This risk is assessed as extreme where the financial impact is greater than $150,000 and the likelihood of this occurring is possible. To mitigate these risks, the report recommendations are required to be adopted.

 

STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS

 

Our People Goal – Foster a community environment that is accessible, affordable, inclusive, healthy and safe:

 

Effective communication

 

Affordable services and initiatives to satisfy community need

 

Our Prosperity Goal – Create the means to enable local jobs creation and lifestyle affordability for the current and future population:

 

Affordable and equitable services and infrastructure

 

Our Organisation Goal – Continually enhance the Shire’s organisational capacity to service the needs or a growing community:

 

An organisational culture that strives for service excellence

 

Sustainable and integrated strategic and operational plans

 

Responsible resource allocation

 

Effective community engagement

 

Improved systems, processes and compliance

 

VOTING REQUIREMENTS

Absolute Majority

 

REPORT RECOMMENDATION:

 

That Council, on  recommendation from the Audit Committee:

 

1.       Endorses the recommendation as contained in the confidential tender evaluation report RFT 15/06 for the Provision of External Audit Services for a period of 3 years (1 July 2015 – 30 June 2018) to appoint the nominated person(s) as the Shire’s registered company auditor in accordance with Section 7.3(1) of the Local Government Act.

2.       Notes details of the successful tenderer will be available for public information in the Tender Register in accordance with Regulation 17 of the Local Government Act (Functions and General) Regulations 1996.

3.       Authorises the Chief Executive Officer to sign the letter of engagement.

4.       Receives the Chief Executive Officer’s report relating to the audit.

5.       Receives the Audit Report and Audit Management Report dated 5 October 2015.

6.       Adopts the Annual Financial Report for the year ended 30 June 2015 subject to the amendments relating to the separate disclosure of infrastructure revaluation increments and decrements for each asset class as  identified by the Department of Local Government and Communities, to be reflected in the 2015/2016 Annual Financial Report for the 2014/2015 comparative figures.

7.       Allocates the net operating surplus from the 2014/2015 financial year to the following initiatives:

Project/Activity Description

GL Code

Allocation

Chinatown Revitalisation - Cap Exp GL Code 1367402

1367403 -  Transfer to Road Reserve - Cap Exp - Other Economic Services

$388,000

Economic Development - KRO3 Building Upgrade GL Code 1482446

147950 - Transfer to Building Reserve - Cap Exp - Office Properties Leased

$670,000

Plant & Equip Renewal/Replacement - Cap Exp - BRAC – Aquatic GL Code 117132

117131 -  Transfer to Building Reserve - Cap Exp - BRAC Aquatic

$117,207

TOTAL

 

$1,175,207

8.       Requests the Chief Executive Officer to provide a report to then next Audit Committee meeting on property rates assessments that are outstanding for over 2 years.

 

(Absolute Majority Required)

 

Attachments

1.

MINUTES OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING HELD 13 OCTOBER 2015

2.

5.1 CONFIDENTIAL ATTACHMENT TO AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING 13 OCTOBER 2015 (Confidential to Councillors and Directors Only)

This attachment is confidential in accordance with Section 5.23(2) of the Local Government Act 1995 section 5.23(2)(c) as it contains “a contract entered into, or which may be entered into, by the local government and which relates to a matter to be discussed at the meeting”.

3.

5.2 ATTACHMENT TO AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING 13 OCTOBER 2015

4.

LETTER DEPARTMENT LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMUNITIES - AASB 116 DISCLOSURE INFRASTRUCTURE REVALUATIONS

  


Item 12.3 - MINUTES OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING HELD 13 OCTOBER 2015

MINUTES OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING HELD 13 OCTOBER 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MISSION AND VALUES OF COUNCIL

 

"A Sustainable Community that is inclusive, attractive, healthy and pleasant to live in, that uses our land so as to preserve our history and environment, respects the rights and equality of our citizens and manages our future growth wisely."

 

UNCONFIRMED

MINUTES

 

 

OF THE

 

Audit Committee Meeting

 

13 October 2015


Item 12.3 - MINUTES OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING HELD 13 OCTOBER 2015

MINUTES OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING HELD 13 OCTOBER 2015

 

 

OUR VISION

 

"A thriving and friendly community that recognises our history and embraces cultural diversity and economic opportunity, whilst nurturing our unique natural and built environment."

 

OUR MISSION

 

“To deliver affordable and quality Local Government services.”

 

CORE VALUES OF THE SHIRE

 

The core values that underpin the achievement of the

 mission will be based on a strong customer service

focus and a positive attitude:

 

Communication

 

Integrity

 

Respect

 

Innovation

 

Transparency

 

Courtesy

 

DISCLAIMER

The purpose of Council Meetings is to discuss, and where possible, make resolutions about items appearing on the agenda.  Whilst Council has the power to resolve such items and may in fact, appear to have done so at the meeting, no person should rely on or act on the basis of such decision or on any advice or information provided by a Member or Officer, or on the content of any discussion occurring, during the course of the meeting.

 

Persons should be aware that the provisions of the Local Government Act 1995 (Section 5.25 (e)) establish procedures for revocation or rescission of a Council decision.  No person should rely on the decisions made by Council until formal advice of the Council decision is received by that person.  The Shire of Broome expressly disclaims liability for any loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on or acting on the basis of any resolution of Council, or any advice or information provided by a Member or Officer, or the content of any discussion occurring, during the course of the Council meeting.

 


Item 12.3 - MINUTES OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING HELD 13 OCTOBER 2015

MINUTES OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING HELD 13 OCTOBER 2015

 

 

SHIRE OF BROOME

Audit Committee Meeting

Tuesday 13 October 2015

INDEX – Minutes

 

1.               Official Opening.. 5

2.               Attendance And Apologies. 5

3.               Declarations Of Financial Interest / Impartiality. 5

4.               Confirmation Of Minutes. 5

5.               Report of Officers. 6

5.1      REQUEST FOR TENDER 15/06 - KIMBERLEY COUNCILS AUDIT TENDER 2015. 6

5.2      ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT & AUDIT REPORT 2014/2015. 13

6.               Motions Without Notice. 24

7.               Matters Behind Closed Doors. 24

8.               Meeting Closure. 24

 


Item 12.3 - MINUTES OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING HELD 13 OCTOBER 2015

MINUTES OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING HELD 13 OCTOBER 2015

 

 

 

NOTICE OF MEETING

 

 

 

Dear Council Member,

 

 

The next Audit Committee of the Shire of Broome will be held on Tuesday, 13 October 2015 in the Council Chambers, Corner Weld and Haas Streets, Broome, commencing at 3:30 PM.

 

 

 

Regards

 

 

 

 

K R DONOHOE

Chief Executive Officer

 

07/10/2015

 


Item 12.3 - MINUTES OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING HELD 13 OCTOBER 2015

MINUTES OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING HELD 13 OCTOBER 2015

 

 

MINUTES OF THE Audit Committee Meeting OF THE SHIRE OF BROOME,

HELD IN THE Council Chambers, Corner Weld and Haas Streets, Broome, ON Tuesday 13 October 2015, COMMENCING AT 3:30 PM.

 

1.         Official Opening

The Chairman welcomed Councillors, Officers and declared the meeting open at 3:35 PM.

2.         Attendance And Apologies 

Attendance:              Cr C Campbell           Shire President

                                      Cr H Tracey                 Deputy Shire President

                                     

Leave of Absence:   Nil

Apologies:                  Cr D Male

Officers:                       Kenn Donohoe          Chief Executive Officer (from 3:45pm)

                                      Paul Martin                  Deputy Chief Executive Officer

                                      Sam Mastrolembo     Director Corporate Services

                                      Andre Schonfeldt      Director Development Services

                                      Michael Dale              Director Infrastructure Services

                                      Theresa Bengtson      Manager Financial Services

                                     

3.         Declarations Of Financial Interest / Impartiality

 

Councillor

Item No

Item

Nature of Interest

Nil

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.         Confirmation Of Minutes

 

Council Resolution:

Moved: Cr H Tracey                                                 Seconded: Cr G Campbell

That the Minutes of the Audit Committee held on 25 August 2015 be confirmed as a true and accurate record of that meeting.

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 2/0

 

 


Item 12.3 - MINUTES OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING HELD 13 OCTOBER 2015

MINUTES OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING HELD 13 OCTOBER 2015

 

 

5.         Report of Officers

 

5.1         REQUEST FOR TENDER 15/06 - KIMBERLEY COUNCILS AUDIT TENDER 2015

LOCATION/ADDRESS:                            Nil

APPLICANT:                                              Nil

FILE:                                                           ADM03

AUTHOR:                                                   Manager Financial Services 

CONTRIBUTOR/S:                                    Nil

RESPONSIBLE OFFICER:                          Director Corporate Services

DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST:                     Nil

DATE OF REPORT:                                    30 September 2015

 

SUMMARY:         Following expiry of the current Audit Agreement on 30 June 2015, Council is required to appoint an Auditor from 1 July 2015. The Request For Tender (RFT) 15/06 - Kimberley Councils Audit Tender 2015 closed on 23 September 2015 and the recommendation of the evaluation panel is now presented to each member Council’s Audit Committee for recommendation to each Council to appoint a new auditor.

 

BACKGROUND

 

Previous Considerations

 

OMC 28 August 2014                        Item 10.2

OMC 2 June 2015                              Item 9.4.3

OMC 25 August 2015                        Item 12.1

 

At the Ordinary Meeting of Council held 25 August 2015 Council resolved:

 

3.   In accordance with regulation 16(a)(ii) of the Local Government (Audit) Regulations 1996 accepts the Audit Specifications and the Procurement Plan as attached in the Audit Committee minutes, as the tender process to be used to select and appoint a person to be an auditor for the Kimberley Councils jointly and/or severally with the Shires of Derby West Kimberley and Halls Creek for the financial years commencing 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2018.

                                                                                               (Absolute Majority Required)

 

The adopted audit tender procurement plan was adopted by Council via recommendation from the Audit Committee which contained the evaluation methodology. The evaluation methodology outlines the criteria and associated weighting which will be applied to the assessment of each tender submitted and detailed as follows:

 

EVALUATION METHODOLOGY

Criteria

Weighting

Lead Partners/Audit Managers experience and performance

25%

Depth of understanding of Local Government and the region

20%

Audit resources allocated

25%

Detailed and well-articulated audit plan

15%

Fees and control of fees

15%

 

The procurement plan outlined the timeframes which aim to complete the tender process by the end of October 2015. The evaluation report is attached to this report and a recommendation is made for consideration of the Audit Committee to present to Council.

 

COMMENT

 

RFT 15/06 was advertised in the West Australian newspaper to invite submissions from 5 September 2015 and closed 4pm 23 September 2015. The tender submissions were opened in the presence of the Manager Financial Services and Manager Governance (Shire of Broome). A total of 10 submissions were received prior to the deadline and opened in the following order:

 

·    Byfields Pty Ltd

·    Butler Settineri (Audit) Pty Ltd

·    RSM Bird Cameron

·    Moore Stephens

·    Anderson Munro & Wyllie

·    William Buck

·    KPMG

·    MACLEOD Corporation Pty  Ltd

·    Grant Thornton

·    AMD Chartered Accountants

 

An Evaluation Panel review meeting was held at the Shire of Broome on 25 September 2015 to review the submissions. This was attended by panel members:

 

·    Manager Financial Services (Shire of Broome)

·    Financial Services Manager (Shire of Halls Creek)

·    Manager Finance (Shire of Derby West Kimberley)

 

Additionally the meeting was attended by the Executive Manager Corporate Services (Shire of Derby/West Kimberley) to provide as a handover due to the pending departure of their Manager of Finance. The attached confidential report discloses the individual evaluation scoring matrix of all submissions and provides a recommendation to the Audit Committee as to the proposed tender submitter based on performance against the Audit Specifications and weighted criteria as was adopted in the tender procurement plan. The Audit Committee is requested to consider the evaluation outcome and recommend to Council to appoint the successful tenderer as Council’s auditor from 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2018 (3 years).

 

CONSULTATION

 

Shire Derby West Kimberley

Shire Halls Creek

 

STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT

 

Local Government Act 1995

 

Section 1.8 Statewide public notice

 

Where under this Act Statewide public notice of a matter is required to be given, section 1.7 applies except that the newspaper referred to in section 1.7(1)(a) is required to circulate generally throughout the State.

 

Section 3.57 Tenders for providing goods or services

 

(1)         A local government is required to invite tenders before it enters into a contract of a prescribed kind under which another person is to supply good or services.

(2)         Regulations may make provision about tenders

 

Division 2 — Appointment of auditors

 

7.2.    Audit

 

The accounts and annual financial report of a local government for each financial year are required to be audited by an auditor appointed by the local government.

 

7.3.    Appointment of auditors

 

(1)     A local government is to, from time to time whenever such an appointment is necessary or expedient, appoint* a person, on the recommendation of the audit committee, to be its auditor.

* Absolute majority required.

(2)     The local government may appoint one or more persons as its auditor.

(3)     The local government’s auditor is to be a person who is —

(a)        a registered company auditor; or

(b)        an approved auditor.

[Section 7.3 amended by No. 49 of 2004 s. 6.]

 

7.4.    Disqualified person not to be auditor

 

(1)     A person may not be appointed as a local government’s auditor if that person is a disqualified person.

(2)     In this section —

disqualified person means a person who —

(a)        is a councillor or an employee of the local government; or

(b)        is a person who is in debt for more than the prescribed amount to the local government for a period of more than 35 days after —

(i)      in the case of that part of the debt which is for a rate or service charge under Part 6, the date the rate notice was issued; or

(ii)     in the case of that part of the debt which is not for a rate or service charge, the date an account was rendered to the person by the local government;

         or

(c)        is an employee of, or a member of the governing body of, an entity of a kind prescribed for the purposes of this paragraph; or

(d)        is a member of a class of persons prescribed for the purposes of this subsection.

 

7.6.    Term of office of auditor

 

(1)     The appointment of a local government’s auditor is to have effect in respect of the audit of the accounts and annual financial report of the local government for a term of not more than 5 financial years, but an auditor is eligible for re‑appointment.

(2)     The appointment of an auditor of a local government ceases to have effect if — 

(a)        his or her registration as a registered company auditor is cancelled; or

(b)        his or her approval as an approved auditor is withdrawn; or

(c)        he or she dies; or

(d)        the auditor ceases to be qualified to hold office as auditor or becomes a disqualified person; or

(e)        the auditor resigns by notice in writing addressed to the local government; or

(f)          the appointment is terminated by the local government by notice in writing.

(3)     Where — 

(a)        the registration of a local government’s auditor as a registered company auditor is suspended; or

(b)        a local government’s auditor becomes unable or unwilling to carry out all or part of his or her duties,

the local government is to appoint* a person to conduct the audit or to complete that part of the audit which remains to be conducted, as the case requires.

* Absolute majority required.

 

Local Government (Audit) Regulations 1996

 

16.     Audit committee, functions of

An audit committee —

(a)     is to provide guidance and assistance to the local government —

(i)      as to the carrying out of its functions in relation to audits carried out under Part 7 of the Act; and

(ii)     as to the development of a process to be used to select and appoint a person to be an auditor;

and

(b)     may provide guidance and assistance to the local government as to —

(i)      matters to be audited; and

(ii)     the scope of audits; and

(iii)     its functions under Part 6 of the Act; and

(iv)    the carrying out of its functions relating to other audits and other matters related to financial management; and

(c)     is to review a report given to it by the CEO under regulation 17(3) (the CEO’s report) and is to —

(i)      report to the council the results of that review; and

(ii)     give a copy of the CEO’s report to the council.

 

Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996

 

Section 5 R14 Requirements for publicly inviting tenders

(1)         When regulation 11(1), 12 or 13 requires tenders to be publicly invited, Statewide public notice of the invitation is to be given.

 

(2)         If the CEO has, under regulation 23(4), prepared a list of acceptable tenderers, instead of giving Statewide public notice the CEO is required to give notice of the invitation to each acceptable tenderer listed.

 

(2a)      If a local government —

(a)        is required to invite a tender; or

(b)        not being required to invite a tender, decides to invite a tender, the local government must, before tenders are publicly invited, determine in writing the criteria for deciding which tender should be accepted.

 

(3)         The notice, whether under subregulation (1) or (2), is required to include —

(a)        a brief description of the goods or services required;

(b)        particulars identifying a person from whom more detailed information as to may be obtained;

(c)        information as to where and how tenders may be submitted; and

(d)        the date and time after which tenders cannot be submitted.

 

(4)     In subregulation (3)(b) a reference to detailed information includes a reference to —

(a)        such information as the local government decides should be disclosed to those interested in submitting a tender;

(b)        detailed specifications of the goods or services required;

(c)        the criteria for deciding which tender should be accepted;

(d)        whether or not the local government has decided to submit a tender; and

(e)        whether or not the CEO has decided to allow tenders to be submittedby facsimile or other electronic means, and if so, how tenders may so be submitted.

 

After a notice has been given under subregulation (1) or (2), a local government may vary the information referred to in subregulation (3) by taking reasonable steps to give each person who has sought copies of the tender documents or each acceptable tenderer, as the case may be, notice of the variation.

 

[Regulation 14 amended in Gazette 29 Jun 2001 p. 3130.]

 

Section 5 R15 Minimum time to be allowed for submitting tenders

 

(1)     If the notice is published in the newspaper as part of giving Statewide public notice,  the time specified in the notice as the time after which tenders cannot be submitted  has to be at least 14 days after the notice is first published in the newspaper as part of   giving Statewide public notice.

 

(2)     If the notice is given to a person listed as an acceptable tenderer, the time specified in  the notice as the time after which tenders cannot be submitted has to be at least 14 days after the notice is given.

 

Clause 2.4 The Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996, Part 4, Division 2, regulation 18, paragraph (2)

 

(1)     A tender that is submitted at a place, and within the time, specified in the invitation for tenders but that fails to comply with any other requirement specified in the invitation may be rejected without considering the merits of the tender.

 

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

 

Policy 2.3.7 Purchasing

Policy 1.2.9 Local Regional Price Reference

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

The three Councils combined budgeted expenditure proposed for the 2015/2016 financial year for external audit services ranges between $90K to $120K per annum. The Shire of Broome has a total expenditure budget for all audit related expenses including external audit services and separate audits allocated to general ledger account code 22200 Audit Fees Op Exp - Other Governance of $45K for 2015/2016.

 

RISK

 

The Kimberley Councils Audit Tender 2015 is a strategic outcome identified by the Kimberley Zone of WALGA Regional Collaborative Group. Its aim is to facilitate an increased level of collaboration between the member Councils of the Zone and achieve resource efficiencies. Should the recommendation of this report not be adopted, the risk of not achieving the above objective has been assessed at a high level, resulting in the Kimberley Zone and each member Council experiencing a possible likelihood of significant delays in appointing an auditor within the procurement deadlines to meet the February 2016 interim audit deadline. Additionally, it is a matter of legislative compliance for the Audit Committee to provide guidance and advice to Council on the appointment of Council’s auditors.

 

To mitigate this risk officers of the three Councils have ensured the evaluation process was conducted in a fair and transparent manner in full consultation with each participating Council. The evaluation report and templates were obtained from the Western Australia Local Government Association procurement handbook and resources which meet the minimum tender compliance requirements.

 

STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS  

 

Our People Goal – Foster a community environment that is accessible, affordable, inclusive, healthy and safe:

 

Effective communication

 

Affordable services and initiatives to satisfy community need

 

Our Prosperity Goal – Create the means to enable local jobs creation and lifestyle affordability for the current and future population:

 

Affordable and equitable services and infrastructure

 

Our Organisation Goal – Continually enhance the Shire’s organisational capacity to service the needs of a growing community:

 

An organisational culture that strives for service excellence

 

Sustainable and integrated strategic and operational plans

 

Responsible resource allocation

 

Effective community engagement

 

Improved systems, processes and compliance

 

 

VOTING REQUIREMENTS

Absolute Majority

 

COMMITTEE RESOLUTION:

(REPORT RECOMMENDATION):

Moved: Cr H Tracey                                                 Seconded: Cr G Campbell

That the Audit Committee recommends that Council:

1.       Endorses the recommendation as contained in the confidential tender evaluation report RFT 15/06 for the Provision of External Audit Services for a period of 3 years (1 July 2015 – 30 June 2018) to appoint the nominated person(s) as the Shire’s registered company auditor in accordance with Section 7.3(1) of the Local Government Act.

2.       Notes details of the successful tenderer will be available for public information in the Tender Register in accordance with Regulation 17 of the Local Government Act (Functions and General) Regulations 1996.

3.       Authorises the Chief Executive Officer to sign the letter of engagement.

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY 2/0

 

Attachments

1.

RFT 15/06 EVALUATION REPORT - KIMBERLEY COUNCILS AUDIT  (Confidential to Councillors and Directors Only)

This attachment is confidential in accordance with Section 5.23(2) of the Local Government Act 1995 section 5.23(2)(c) as it contains “a contract entered into, or which may be entered into, by the local government and which relates to a matter to be discussed at the meeting”.

 


Item 12.3 - MINUTES OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING HELD 13 OCTOBER 2015

MINUTES OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING HELD 13 OCTOBER 2015

 

 

 

The Manager Financial Services tabled correspondence received from the Department of Local Government and Communities received on the 13 October 2015 regarding the disclosure of infrastructure revaluation changes.

5.2         ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT & AUDIT REPORT 2014/2015

LOCATION/ADDRESS:                            Nil

APPLICANT:                                              Nil

FILE:                                                           FRE02

AUTHOR:                                                   Manager Financial Services 

CONTRIBUTOR/S:                                    Nil

RESPONSIBLE OFFICER:                          Director Corporate Services

DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST:                     Nil

DATE OF REPORT:                                    2 October 2015

 

SUMMARY:         The Audit Committee is required to consider and recommend to Council, the adoption of the annual financial report, examine the audit and management reports, and review the report prepared by the Chief Executive Officer.

 

BACKGROUND

 

Previous Considerations

 

Nil

 

Pursuant to Section 7.9 of the Local Government Act 1995 (the ‘Act’), an Auditor is required to examine the accounts and annual financial report submitted by a local government for audit. The Auditor is also required, by 31 December following the financial year to which the accounts and report relate, prepare a report thereon and forward a copy of that report to:

            

             (a) Mayor or President; and

             (b) The Chief Executive Officer; and

             (c) The Minister

 

Furthermore, in accordance with Regulation 10(4) of the Local Government (Audit) Regulations 1996, where it is considered appropriate to do so, the Auditor may prepare a Management Report to accompany the Auditor’s Report, which is also to be forwarded to the persons specified in Section 7.9 of the Act.

 

On finalisation of the Shire’s 2014/2015 final audit, the Auditors presented their initial findings to the Audit Committee for consideration at an informal briefing session held Wednesday 16 September 2015 which was attended by Councillors Graeme Campbell and Desiree Male.

 

The Audit Committee is required to examine the reports of the auditor after receiving a report from the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) on the matters reported and:

 

·            Determine if any matters raised require action to be taken by the local government; and

·            Ensure that appropriate action is taken in respect of those matters.

 

The Audit Committee is also required to review a report prepared by the CEO on any actions taken in respect of any matters raised in the report of the auditor and presents the report to Council for adoption. A copy of the report is to be forwarded to the Minister prior to the end of the next financial year or 6 months after the last report prepared by the auditor is received, whichever is the latest in time.

 

2014/2015 Operating Result

 

An analysis of the 2014/2015 operating result is provided in this report and how it compares to the forecasted outcomes of the Shire’s adopted Integrated Planning and Reporting Framework. As a background, the 2014/2015 Annual Financial Report discloses the results of the second year of implementation of the newly legislated Integrated Planning and Reporting Framework. The plans contained in the framework provide funding strategies to ensure Council can meet its adopted strategic objectives, while maintaining and forecasting impacts on the Shire’s future financial sustainability.

 

As reported to Council in the two preceding years in regards to the 2012/2013 and 2013/2014 Annual Financial Reports, the Shire’s 2014/2015 Annual Budget process continued to place significant focus on a number of ‘informing strategies’.  As part of the budget finalisation it was still evident in the second year since the introduction of the integrated planning framework, that the desired allocations toward capital renewal outlined within the prepared Asset Management Plans are not being achieved. 

 

Effectively, the intended annual allocations to Capital Reserves were either not provided for in the 2014/2015 Annual Budget or; in some cases Capital Reserves drawn to enable Capital Works programs to be sufficiently funded.  This is not sustainable over the longer term, triggering a review of the 2013-2028 Long Term Financial Plan (LTFP) previously adopted by Council at the Ordinary Meeting of Council held 27 October 2013.

 

The draft 2015-2030 Shire of Broome Long Term Financial Plan was presented to Councillors at a workshop held on 6 February 2015, as a follow on from a two day workshop held on 14 and 15 November 2014. At these workshops, the draft Strategic Community Plan 2015-2025 and Corporate Business Plan 2015-2019 were presented, containing the results of the interim desktop review.

 

The Shire’s LTFP was reviewed with consideration for these revised documents. As part of this process a review was conducted to prioritise projects within the organisation’s financial capacity. The objective of the revised LTFP was to reduce the overall reliance on reserve funding and to prioritise the funding capacity for the forecasted expenditure detailed in the Shire’s proposed Capital Renewal program. Funding of renewal expenditure through municipal funds, provides for long term financial viability and there has been a focus on achieving an improved operating surplus.

 

The draft LTFP contained some key assumptions which included organisational savings of $1.4M and a dividend from Waste operations of approximately $1M to offset operations. The SCP and CBP were adopted at the SMC held 19 February 2015, including the organisational restructure which resulted in $1.8M savings in employee costs per annum. The savings identified in 2014/2015 have been carried through to the 2015/2016 financial year and are a one off event as a result of the management decisions implemented to ensure the long term financial sustainability of the Shire. The revised 2015-2030 LTFP was adopted by Council at the Special Meeting of Council (SMC) held 13 August 2015.

 

The Audit Committee is requested to consider and recommend adoption of the annual financial report to Council.

 

 

COMMENT

 

Chief Executive Officer’s Report to the Audit Committee

 

Following is the CEO’s report to the Audit Committee on matters arising from the audit and management reports. Extracts from the audit and management reports are indented in italics.

 

Audit Report

 

There were no matters of statutory non-compliance reported.

 

Management Report

 

The Auditor’s Management Report provides an overview of the approach undertaken in respect of the annual audit process and the associated outcomes of the audit. The Management Report also identifies any findings that, whilst generally not material in relation to the overall audit of the financial report, are considered relevant to the day to day operations of the Shire.

 

1.   Matters Identified

 

As part of the 2014/2015 final audit, the Auditor identified five areas in which further improvements to the Shire’s current processes and procedures could be considered for implementation. These areas have also been assigned a finding rating, as detailed in the following table:

 

Key To Ratings

 

The Ratings in this management letter are based on the audit team’s assessment of risks and concerns with respect to the probability and/or consequence of adverse outcomes if action is not taken. We give consideration to these potential adverse outcomes in the context of both quantitative impact (for example financial loss) and qualitative impact (for example inefficiency, non-compliance, poor service to the public or loss of public confidence).

 

Significant        - Those findings where there is potentially a significant risk to the entity should the finding not be addressed by the entity promptly. A significant rating could indicate the need for a modified audit opinion in the current year, or in a subsequent reporting period if not addressed. However even if the issue is not likely to impact the audit opinion, it should be addressed promptly.

 

Moderate        - Those findings which are of sufficient concern to warrant action being taken by the entity as soon as practicable.

 

Minor                - Those findings that are not of primary concern but still warrant action being taken.

 

Each item is specifically discussed within the Management Report, as appended to the 2014/2015 Annual Financial Report as attached to this report, along with the Shire’s management response. In terms of the management responses, appropriate actions are proposed to be implemented where required to address each of the findings.

 

2.   Internal Financial Controls

 

During the audit, the Auditor examined the design and implementation of the internal controls surrounding the accounting and financial control systems. The matters that relate to internal control have been identified and discussed in the matters identified in section 1 of the aforementioned Management Report (none identified).

 

3.   Audit Adjustments

 

Following the presentation of the Draft 2014/2015 Financial Report to the Auditor, officers actioned the following amendments that needed to be made:

 

·            Adjustment for the current and non-current annual leave and long service leave provision. The schedule had been updated and the provision calculated and the timing of processing the journal occurred post on-site audit.

·            Adjustment for the provision for doubtful rates debtors. The increase represented an immaterial value however, as officers are now basing the calculation of the provision on actual rates debts, rather than an arbitrary percentage, the journal was processed post on-site audit after due consideration was made to the list of outstanding rates debtors.

·            Adjustment for the revaluation of infrastructure and furniture and fittings. The delay of receipt of the final, signed valuation report from AARB resulted in the journal being processed post on-site audit to recognise the change in valuation.

 

These adjustments have no material affect on the Shire of Broome’s financial situation.

 

4.   Other Matters

 

There were no identified matters of fraud to report and there were no disagreements with management about significant accounting matters.

 

2014/2015 Operating Result

 

The year end operating surplus result for 2014/2015 occurred through a number of factors. This included initiating a number of management directives and reviews to realise organisational savings across the Shire. These include unspent materials and contracts across operating and capital activities/projects, leased staff housing and other expenses of $413K. Savings in utilities of $346K include anticipated increases in electricity utilities which did not occur as previously estimated and implementation of public open space strategies to reduce water usage. The organisational restructure and subsequent freeze on recruitment for the rest of the financial year resulted in additional savings of $248K. Interim rates have sourced additional rates revenue of $448K as developments have finalised, plus a review of non-rateable properties in the Shire’s database has resulted in additional $162K of back rates being raised for properties such as telecommunication towers, exempt properties with an expired exempt land use and new parcels not previously advised from Landgate.

 

However, these savings were offset by a number of shortfalls in some areas. These include user charges from fees and charges revenue including BRAC Ovals due to North West Expo being relocated and overall BRAC visitor usage being down, Civic Centre venue user charges, rent concession for the Magabala Books tenancy as granted by Council, subdivision engineering supervision charges, and sanitation general refuse. Statutory and regulatory fees, licences and fines revenue was down $62,000.

 

The year end result was also impacted by the recognition of the revaluation of the Shire’s infrastructure and furniture and fittings assets at fair value in accordance with regulation 17A of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996. This is the third and final stage of fair value revaluations with the cycle recommencing in the 2015/2016 financial year for the recognition of plant and equipment assets to be recognised at fair value.

 

The financial year ended 30 June 2015 resulted in the following carried forward operating surplus:

 

             $2,305,519       2015/2016 Budgeted brought forward operating surplus

             $1,133,125       2014/2015 Net Actual operating surplus

             $3,438,644       Total 2015/2016 Carried forward operating surplus

 

The 2015/2016 Annual Budget that was adopted at the Special Meeting of Council (SMC) held 13 August 2015, adopted an estimated brought forward operating surplus of $2,305,519. This was comprised of the following projects estimated to be carried forward for inclusion in the 2015/2016 Annual Budget:

 

Project/Activity Description

Allocation

Sanctuary Caravan Park Op Exp - Tourism & Area Promotion

10,000

Project - Heritage Style Guide - Op Exp - Other Culture

30,000

Youth Development Program ((Net Grant Funding of $15K)

10,000

Consultant – Trails Master Plan (Net Grant Funding of $25K)

15,000

BRAC Building Renewal – Dry – Hard Court (Net Grant Funding of $47,626)

47,874

Cable Beach Road East (south side) – At TAFE in existing Bus Bay

16,900

Amphitheatre Project Outlet Structure Renewal (Stage 1 & 2) Muni Funded

20,000

Rates Review

13,000

BRAC Website Development

12,000

Intranet Upgrade

95,000

Payroll System Upgrade

66,000

Town Beach Boat Ramp

8,500

Catalyse Research and Strategy

27,900

Lorrikeet Drive Extension

23,000

Archer Street Design

15,000

Infrastructure Fair Value

68,500

Morgan Road upgrade – final invoices

19,500

St John Ambulance – repairs from 14/15

17,000

Vehicle Renewal – Water truck – Hino

180,000

Vehicle Renewal – D-MAX Tilt Tray

12,066

Vehicle Renewal - - Squirrel

70,000

Prepaid 15/16 Financial Assistance Grants and Roads Grants

1,486,197

Unallocated Estimated Surplus

42,082

TOTAL

$2,305,519

 

The unallocated balance of $42,082 represents a provision for the estimated operating surplus pending end of year adjustments and audit were finalised after the adoption of the budget. The total carried forward operating surplus is $3,438,644, resulting in an actual unallocated net operating surplus of $1,175,207.

 

This report contains recommendations for Council’s consideration of the allocation of the $1,175,207 net actual operating surplus. It is proposed for this to be fully allocated against significant initiatives in the 2015/2016 Adopted Annual Budget identified to require loan funding by transferring the funds to the respective Reserve account.

 

The initiatives identified include:

 

Project/Activity Description

15/16 Total Expenditure

15/16 Loan Funding

Proposed Allocation

Chinatown Revitalisation - Cap Exp GL Code 1367402

11,700,000

1,700,000

388,000

Economic Development - KRO3 Building Upgrade GL Code 1482446

4,280,000

2,880,000

670,000

Plant & Equip Renewal/Replacement - Cap Exp - BRAC – Aquatic GL Code 117132

3,320,000

496,722

117,207

TOTAL

$19,300,000

$5,076,722

$1,175,207

 

CONSULTATION

 

Nil

 

STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT

 

Local Government Act 1995

6.4.        Financial report

(1)         A local government is to prepare an annual financial report for the preceding financial year and such other financial reports as are prescribed.

(2)         The financial report is to — 

(a)        be prepared and presented in the manner and form prescribed; and

(b)        contain the prescribed information.

(3)         By 30 September following each financial year or such extended time as the Minister allows, a local government is to submit to its auditor — 

(a)        the accounts of the local government, balanced up to the last day of the preceding financial year; and

(b)        the annual financial report of the local government for the preceding financial year.

 

7.9.        Audit to be conducted

(1)         An auditor is required to examine the accounts and annual financial report submitted for audit and, by the 31 December next following the financial year to which the accounts and report relate or such later date as may be prescribed, to prepare a report thereon and forward a copy of that report to — 

(a)        the mayor or president; and

(b)        the CEO of the local government; and

(c)        the Minister.

(2)         Without limiting the generality of subsection (1), where the auditor considers that — 

(a)        there is any error or deficiency in an account or financial report submitted for audit; or

(b)        any money paid from, or due to, any fund or account of a local government has been or may have been misapplied to purposes not authorised by law; or

(c)        there is a matter arising from the examination of the accounts and annual financial report that needs to be addressed by the local government, details of that error, deficiency, misapplication or matter, are to be included in the report by the auditor.

(3)         The Minister may direct the auditor of a local government to examine a particular aspect of the accounts and the annual financial report submitted for audit by that local government and to — 

(a)        prepare a report thereon; and

(b)        forward a copy of that report to the Minister,

             and that direction has effect according to its terms.

(4)         If the Minister considers it appropriate to do so, the Minister is to forward a copy of the report referred to in subsection (3), or part of that report, to the CEO of the local government to be dealt with under section 7.12A.

 

7.12A.   Duties of local government with respect to audits

(1)         A local government is to do everything in its power to —

(a)        assist the auditor of the local government to conduct an audit and carry out his or her other duties under this Act in respect of the local government; and

(b)        ensure that audits are conducted successfully and expeditiously.

(2)         Without limiting the generality of subsection (1), a local government is to meet with the auditor of the local government at least once in every year.

(3)         A local government is to examine the report of the auditor prepared under section 7.9(1), and any report prepared under section 7.9(3) forwarded to it, and is to —

(a)        determine if any matters raised by the report, or reports, require action to be taken by the local government; and

(b)        ensure that appropriate action is taken in respect of those matters.

(4)         A local government is to —

(a)        prepare a report on any actions under subsection (3) in respect of an audit conducted in respect of a financial year; and

(b)        forward a copy of that report to the Minister, by the end of the next financial year, or 6 months after the last report prepared under section 7.9 is received by the local government, whichever is the latest in time.

 

5.54.      Acceptance of annual reports

(1)         Subject to subsection (2), the annual report for a financial year is to be accepted* by the local government no later than 31 December after that financial year.

* Absolute majority required.

(2)         If the auditor’s report is not available in time for the annual report for a financial year to be accepted by 31 December after that financial year, the annual report is to be accepted by the local government no later than 2 months after the auditor’s report becomes available.

 

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

 

2.1.1 - Materiality in Financial Reporting

2.1.4 - Significant Accounting Policies

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

The proposed allocation of the surplus is based on the principle of reducing Council’s borrowings. The $1,175,207 unallocated 2014/2015 operating surplus is to be transferred to the respective reserve account to offset any significant loan funded initiatives budgeted for the 2015/2016 financial year.

 

In terms of materiality, the unallocated surplus amount represents a variance of 3% compared to budgeted operating revenue for 2014/2015 of $36,801,700 (excluding grants and contributions for assets and profit on sale of assets). This is 2% over the adopted threshold of 1% ($368,017) as per policy 2.1.1 Materiality in Financial Reporting.

 

RISK

 

The audited Annual Financial Report is a key control measure used to report to Council and its stakeholders to provide assurance that all systems, processes and controls have been established by the CEO to minimise the risk of any material misstatement or loss caused by fraud or error. The audit findings indicate areas requiring improvement and management have implemented measures to review processes. The report measures Council’s financial capacity to achieve its adopted strategic and operational objectives. A material variance indicates areas requiring investigation such as budget estimation/formulation, workforce management and Council’s overall resource capacity to achieve its strategic objectives.

 

The recommendation by the Audit Committee to Council for the adoption of the Annual Financial Report, Audit and Management Report and CEO’s report is a key statutory compliance matter. Should this not be recommended for adoption, this will cause a delay in Council’s adoption of the 2014/2015 Annual Report to be presented at the October Ordinary Meeting of Council (OMC), which will flow on to delaying the Annual Electors Meeting (AEM). This poses a high risk due to the possible likelihood of occurring and the impact of a significant delay to major deliverables.

 

In regards to the proposed allocation of the 2014/2015 surplus, should the Audit Committee make alternative recommendations, the long term financial impacts of such should be analysed to ensure there are no adverse impacts to Council’s future financial sustainability and should be in line with the adopted LTFP. Surplus funds are not recommended to be committed to ongoing operational programs and activities which will further reduce Council’s future ability to maintain optimal operating surpluses to fund capital renewal priorities as per the LTFP. This risk is assessed as extreme where the financial impact is greater than $150,000 and the likelihood of this occurring is possible. To mitigate these risks, the report recommendations are required to be adopted.

 

STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS  

 

Our People Goal – Foster a community environment that is accessible, affordable, inclusive, healthy and safe:

 

Encourage communication.

 

Identify affordable services and initiatives to satisfy community needs.

 

Our Prosperity Goal – Create the means to enable local jobs creation and lifestyle affordability for the current and future population:

 

Encourage the provision of affordable land for residential, industrial, commercial and community use.

 

Our Organisation Goal – Continually enhance the Shire’s organisational capacity to service the needs or a growing community:

 

Develop an organisational culture that strives for service excellence.

 

Review and analyse strategic and operational plans.

 

Manage resource allocation.

 

Manage staff attraction and retention.

 

Improve systems, processes and compliance.

 

 

VOTING REQUIREMENTS

Absolute Majority

 

REPORT RECOMMENDATION:

That Council on recommendation from the Audit Committee:

1.       Receives the Chief Executive Officer’s report relating to the audit.

2.       Receives the Audit Report and Audit Management Report dated 5 October 2015.

3.       Adopts the Annual Financial Report for the year ended 30 June 2015.

4.       Allocates the net operating surplus from the 2014/2015 financial year to the following           initiatives:

 

Project/Activity Description

GL Code

Allocation

Chinatown Revitalisation - Cap Exp GL Code 1367402

1367403 -  Transfer to Road Reserve - Cap Exp - Other Economic Services

$388,000

Economic Development - KRO3 Building Upgrade GL Code 1482446

147950 - Transfer to Building Reserve - Cap Exp - Office Properties Leased

$670,000

Plant & Equip Renewal/Replacement - Cap Exp - BRAC – Aquatic GL Code 117132

117131 -  Transfer to Building Reserve - Cap Exp - BRAC Aquatic

$117,207

TOTAL

 

$1,175,207

 

(Absolute Majority Required)

 

COMMITTEE Resolution:

Moved: Cr G Campbell                                          Seconded: Cr H Tracey

That Standing Orders be suspended at 3:45PM

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 2/0

 

COMMITTEE Resolution:

Moved: Cr G Campbell                                          Seconded: Cr H Tracey

That Standing Orders be reinstated at 3:53PM

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 2/0

 

COMMITEE Resolution:

Moved: Cr G Campbell                                          Seconded: Cr H Tracey

That Council on recommendation from the Audit Committee:

1.       Receives the Chief Executive Officer’s report relating to the audit.

2.       Receives the Audit Report and Audit Management Report dated 5 October 2015.

3.       Adopts the Annual Financial Report for the year ended 30 June 2015 subject to the amendments relating to the separate disclosure of infrastructure revaluation increments and decrements for each asset class as  identified by the Department of Local Government and Communities, to be reflected in the 2015/2016 Annual Financial Report for the 2014/2015 comparative figures.

4.       Allocates the net operating surplus from the 2014/2015 financial year to the following initiatives:

Project/Activity Description

GL Code

Allocation

Chinatown Revitalisation - Cap Exp GL Code 1367402

1367403 -  Transfer to Road Reserve - Cap Exp - Other Economic Services

$388,000

Economic Development - KRO3 Building Upgrade GL Code 1482446

147950 - Transfer to Building Reserve - Cap Exp - Office Properties Leased

$670,000

Plant & Equip Renewal/Replacement - Cap Exp - BRAC – Aquatic GL Code 117132

117131 -  Transfer to Building Reserve - Cap Exp - BRAC Aquatic

$117,207

TOTAL

 

$1,175,207

5.       Requests the Chief Executive Officer to provide a report to then next Audit Committee meeting on property rates assessments that are outstanding for over 2 years.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY BY ABSOLUTE MAJORITY 2/0

 

Reason:

A letter from the Department of Local Government and Communities dated 9 October 2015 which was received via email on 13 October 2015, as advised by the Shire of Broome’s auditor RSM Bird Cameron, was tabled at the meeting which identified a matter regarding the disclosure of the fair value revaluation increments and decrements which is required to be disclosed separately for each asset class in accordance with Australian Accounting Standard 116 Property, Plant and Equipment. As the 2014/2015 report had already been audited, further advice from the Department confirmed that the amendments were required to be disclosed in the 2014/2015 comparative year within next year’s 2015/2016 Annual Financial Report.

 

To inform Council of the outstanding property rates assessments as part of Council’s adopted policy 2.1.3 Rates Debt Recovery.

 

Attachments

1.

Annual Financial Report 2014/2015

2.

Audit Management Letter 2014/2015

  

 


Item 12.3 - MINUTES OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING HELD 13 OCTOBER 2015

MINUTES OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING HELD 13 OCTOBER 2015

 

 

6.         Motions Without Notice

Nil

7.         Matters Behind Closed Doors

Nil

8.         Meeting Closure

There being no further business the Chairman declared the meeting closed at  3:59PM.

 

 


Item 12.3 - MINUTES OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING HELD 13 OCTOBER 2015

5.2 ATTACHMENT TO AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING 13 OCTOBER 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Attachments To Agenda Items

 

 

 

FOR THE

 

Audit Committee Meeting

 

13 October, 2015


Item 12.3 - MINUTES OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING HELD 13 OCTOBER 2015

5.2 ATTACHMENT TO AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING 13 OCTOBER 2015

 

 

SHIRE OF BROOME

Audit Committee Meeting

13 October 2015

 Attachments To Agenda Items

 

   

5.2         ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT & AUDIT REPORT 2014/2015

Attachment 1      Annual Financial Report 2014/2015 Error! Bookmark not defined.

Attachment 2      Audit Management Letter 2014/2015 Error! Bookmark not defined.                           


Item 12.3 - MINUTES OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING HELD 13 OCTOBER 2015

5.2 ATTACHMENT TO AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING 13 OCTOBER 2015

 

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Item 12.3 - MINUTES OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING HELD 13 OCTOBER 2015

5.2 ATTACHMENT TO AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING 13 OCTOBER 2015

 

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Item 12.3 - MINUTES OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING HELD 13 OCTOBER 2015

5.2 ATTACHMENT TO AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING 13 OCTOBER 2015

 

 


 


 

                   


Item 12.3 - MINUTES OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING HELD 13 OCTOBER 2015

LETTER DEPARTMENT LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMUNITIES - AASB 116 DISCLOSURE INFRASTRUCTURE REVALUATIONS

 

 



AgendaOrdinary Meeting of Council 15 October 2015                                                                        Page 131 of 132

 

 

12.4       Shire of Broome Final Response to the Proposed Yawuru Nagulagun / Roebuck Bay Marine Park indicative joint management plan 2015 and the Yawuru Birragun Conservation Park draft management plan 2015.

LOCATION/ADDRESS:                            Shire of Broome Out of Town Areas and Roebuck Bay

APPLICANT:                                              Nil

FILE:                                                           NAT55.3;NAT55.4

AUTHOR:                                                   Coastal Park Governance Officer

CONTRIBUTOR/S:                                    Nil

RESPONSIBLE OFFICER:                          Director of Engineering Services

DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST:                     Nil

DATE OF REPORT:                                    1 October 2015

 

SUMMARY:         At the Special Council meeting held 10 September 2015 Council considered the draft Marine Park Management Plan and Conservation Park Management Plan, and resolved to make a formal submission to the Department of Parks and Wildlife.  This report presents Council with a draft final supplementary submission and seeks Council’s endorsement.

 

BACKGROUND

Previous Considerations

Yawuru Conservation Estate - The Proposed Yawuru Nagulagun /

Roebuck Bay Marine Park Indicative Joint Management Plan 2015 And The

Yawuru Birragun Conservation Park Draft Management Plan 2015

OMC

10 September 2015

Item 6.2.1

 

 

 

 

 

Marine Park and Broome Port Authority Waters

OMC

09 August 2012

Item 9.2.1

 

 

OMC

18 July 2013

Item 9.2.1

 

 

OMC

17 October 2013

Item 9.2.1

 

 

 

 

 

In Town Management Plan

SMC

12 May 2015

Item 6.4.2

OMC

21 February 2013

Item 9.2.13 

 

OMC

19 April 2012

Item 9.2.4

 

OMC

15 March 2012

Item 9.2.5

 

OMC

1 August 2011

Item 9.4.8

 

 

Out of Town Management Plan

SMC

10 September 2015

Item 6.2.1

 

SMC

29 May 2013

Item 9.2.1

 

OMC

4 October 2012

Item 9.2.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yawuru Conservation Estate

OMC

29 October 2009

Item 9.1.1

 

On 25 February 2010 the Yawuru People, the Western Australian Government, the Shire of

Broome and others entered into the Yawuru Indigenous Land Use Area Agreement and

the Yawuru Prescribed Body Corporate Indigenous Land Use Agreement (the Yawuru

Agreements). These agreements cover an area of approximately 5,300 sq kms in and

around Broome.

Clause 10 of the Yawuru Indigenous Land Use Area Agreement provides as follows:

As soon as reasonably practicable after the Registration Date, the Parties shall incorporatethe following areas into the Conservation Estate:

(a) marine park areas, as described in Part 1 of Schedule 7 (Marine Park Areas);

(b) townsite areas, as described in Part 2 of Schedule 7 (Townsite Areas) and

(c) out of town areas, as described in Part 3 of Schedule 7 (Out of Town Areas).”

The areas included in the Conservation Estate outlined above are further defined in the

Yawuru Agreements. The following Table outlines the Voting and Tenure Responsibility

associated with the relevant Conservation Estate Areas:

 

Conservation Estate Area

Voting and Tenure Responsibility 

Nagulagun (Marine Park Areas)

(Also referred to in this report as the Marine Park the subject of the Marine Park Management Plan)

Yawuru NBY and DPaW

Reserved as an A- Class Reserve.

Minyirr Buru (Townsite Areas)

Yawuru NBY and the Shire of Broome Draft Management Plan not yet finalised.

Cable Beach Intertidal Zone (currently within the Out of Town Areas).

Located approximately 600 metres north of the rocks.

Yawuru NBY, Shire of Broome and DPaW.

Draft Management Plan / tri-partite arrangements yet to be developed and is referenced as Area 25 Portion 1 & 2 ITZ Tri-partite Management Area (Yawuru PBC ILUA).

Birragun (Out-of-Town Areas)

(Also referred to in this report as the Conservation Park the subject of the Conservation Park Management Plan)

Yawuru NBY and DPaW

Held by Yawuru in Fee simple and leased to State on 99 year lease.

 

Since the registration of the agreements, draft management plans were developed and the Shire of Broome were presented with an overview of the two draft plans and potential impacts at the Special Meeting Of Council  - 10 September 2015 ( Agenda Item 6.2.1).

 

Attachment A:    Yawuru Birragun Conservation Park draft management plan 2015

 

Attachment B:   Proposed Yawuru Nagulagun / Roebuck Bay Marine Park indicative

                             joint management plan 2015) Areas.

At this SMC (10 September 2015 - Agenda Item 6.2.1) the following Resolution was provided by Council:

 

Moved: Cr D Male Seconded: Cr A Poelina

That Council:

1. Notes the 19 June 2015 release of the Proposed Yawuru Nagulagun / Roebuck Bay

   Marine Park indicative joint management plan 2015; and the Yawuru Birragun

   Conservation Park draft management plan 2015.

 

2. Endorse a media release to further advise the Broome Community of the draft

   management plans and potential impacts associated with these plans.

3. Notes that the Shire of Broome has been granted an extension of 30 days to provide

    a submission to the Department of Parks and Wildlife (9 November 2015) and

   requests the Chief Executive Officer to make an initial submission on behalf of the

   Shire of Broome in accordance with the body of this report by 25 September 2015;

4. Requests Department of Parks and Wildlife Planning Staff to present the draft

   Management Plans to Councillors at a workshop during October 2015.

5. Requests the Chief Executive Officer to present the final supplementary submission

    to the October Ordinary Council meeting for endorsement prior to submitting this to

    the Department of Parks and Wildlife.

6. Requests the Chief Executive Officer to write to the Minister of Environment

    requesting that the Minister grant an extension of time for public submission until 9 

    November 2015.

In response to the above resolution, Officers progressed the following:

i.   The development and publication of a media release

Attachment C:      Copy of Advertorial  - Broome Advertiser (17 September 2015).

ii.  The Chief Executive Officer wrote to the Hon Albert Jacob, Minister for the Environment and Heritage on 21 September 2015 to request an extension for public submissions.

Attachment D:    Copy of letter to the Minister for the Environment and Heritage

iii.  An initial submission was provided by the Shire of Broome Chief Executive Officer to the Department of Parks and Wildlife Director General on 25 September 2015

Attachment E:     Shire of Broome Chief Executive Officer cover letter to the        Director General of the Department of Parks and Wildlife.

Attachment F:               Initial Shire of Broome submission to the Department of Parks and Wildlife.

iv. The Department of Parks and Wildlife will be providing a presentation to Councillors at a Workshop on 12 November 2015.

This Agenda Item provides the draft final supplementary submission for endorsement by Council prior to submitting to the Department of Parks and Wildlife by 9 November 2015 (as noted at Resolution 3 of SMC (10 September 2015)).

 

COMMENT

An external consultant (Strategen Environmental) was engaged to undertake a review of the initial Shire of Broome submission to the Department of Parks and Wildlife and other relevant documentation pertaining to the Yawuru Birragun Conservation Park draft management plan 2015 and the Proposed Yawuru Nagulagun / Roebuck Bay Marine Park indicative joint management plan 2015.

The consultants were provided with the following documentation to assist in the review of the potential impacts that the draft plans may have on the Shire:

·    Yawuru Birragun Conservation Park draft management plan 2015.

·    Proposed Yawuru Nagulagun / Roebuck Bay Marine Park indicative joint management plan 2015.

·    DPaW Public Comment Submission Form.

·    Copy of Media Release:  (MEDIA RELEASE - Council concerns with marine conservation park plans. 14 Sept 2015).

·    Copy of Special meeting of Council Minutes (10 September  2015).

·    Broome Advertiser advertorial (as published 17 September 2015).

·    Shire of Broome’s initial submissions to DPaW (25 September 2015).

The consultants noted the issues raised by the draft management plans are complex and the following key issues were identified:

·    lack of clarity on the assessment framework for development, which could result in numerous piecemeal assessments and advice on individual developments

·    lack of baseline data and impact assessment on ecological and cultural values, which presents a high degree of uncertainty in the actual management to be implemented

·    lack of clarity in the actual access restrictions that will occur in Culturally Sensitive Areas and the lack of definition of tourism and amenity values that could be present in these areas and thus considered when planning access restrictions

·    potential for the currently undefined management strategies and access restrictions to be developed without input from the Shire or other relevant stakeholders.

Officers have incorporated the consultant’s response into Attachment G as the draft final supplementary submission to be presented to the Department of Parks and Wildlife.

Attachment G: Shire of Broome Draft Final Supplementary Submission.

If endorsed by Council, the Chief Executive Officer will forward the Shire of Broome endorsed response (Attachment G) to the Director General of the Department of Parks on Wildlife on behalf of the Shire of Broome before 6 November 2015.

STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT

Terrestrial Statutory Environment – Public Notices And Submissions

Conservation and Land Management Act 1984 (WA) (Conservation Commission)

59.     Plans to be referred to other bodies

(1)  The responsible body may submit the proposed management plan, modified if it thinks fit after considering submissions made under section 58, to any organization or body it thinks appropriate, together with a summary of those submissions.

(2)  The responsible body shall submit the proposed management plan to the local government of each district within which the land in question is situated and any such local government shall, notwithstanding section 58, be given a reasonable time in which to prepare written submissions on the proposed plan.

Marine Park Statutory Environment

Conservation and Land Management Act 1984 (WA) (Conservation Commission)

Division 3 — Marine reserves:

13.     Marine reserves, reservation of

(4)     Subject to subsection (4a), the Governor may by the order under subsection (1) which constitutes a marine nature reserve, a marine park or a marine management area, or by a subsequent order published in the Gazette, classify the reserve, park or management area as of Class A and, in that case, the purpose of the reserve, park or management area shall not be amended or

          cancelled, nor shall the boundary thereof be altered otherwise than by an addition thereto, except by Act or pursuant to subsection (6).

 (6)    If either House of Parliament passes a resolution, of which notice has been given within the first 14 sitting days of the House after a copy of an order has been laid before the House under subsection (5), that the order be disallowed the order

          thereupon ceases to have effect.

(7)     The disallowance of the order does not affect or invalidate any act done in good faith by the Minister, or any officer performing any functions under this Act relating to the waters referred to in the order, before the passing of the resolution.

(8)     In subsection (1) Western Australian waters means all waters —

                 (a)  that are within the limits of the State; or

                 (b)  that are coastal waters of the State as defined in the Off-shore (Application Of Laws) Act 1982.

(9)     Without limiting section 6(6), the reservation of waters under this section as a marine nature reserve, marine park or marine management area extends to the airspace, sea-bed, land and subsoil referred to in section 6(6)(a) and (b).

(10)   A reference in this Act to the reservation of, or the reservation of waters as, a        marine nature reserve, marine park or marine management area includes a reference to the alteration of any boundary of the reserve, park or management area to include additional waters.

13A. Marine nature reserves, purpose of and prohibited acts in

(1)     The reservation of a marine nature reserve shall be for —

                 (a) the conservation and restoration of the natural environment; and

                 (b) the protection, care and study of indigenous flora and fauna; and

                 (c) the preservation of any feature of archaeological, historic or scientific

                        interest.

(2)     Subject to section 13D, aquaculture, commercial fishing, recreational fishing and pearling activity shall not be carried out in a marine nature reserve.

(3)     Despite section 4(1) but subject to section 13E, exploratory drilling for, or production of, petroleum, geothermal energy resources or geothermal energy under the Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources Act 1967 or petroleum under the Petroleum (Submerged Lands) Act 1982 shall not be carried out in a marine nature reserve.

13B. Marine parks, purpose of and prohibited acts in

(1)     The reservation of a marine park shall be for the purpose of allowing only that level of recreational and commercial activity which is consistent with the proper conservation and restoration of the natural environment, the protection of indigenous flora and fauna and the preservation of any feature of archaeological, historic or scientific interest.

(2)     As soon as practicable after the reservation of a marine park the Minister shall classify the park under section 62, or divide the park into areas and classify each area under section 62, as —

                 (a) a general use area; or

                 (b) a sanctuary area; or

                 (c) a recreation area; or

                 (d) a special purpose area,

          in accordance with a proposal for the classification publicly notified in  accordance with section 14, modified as the Minister thinks fit to give effect to submissions made under section 14.

(3)     Subsections (5), (6) and (7) have effect despite anything in the Fish Resources Management Act 1994, but in the event of any other conflict or inconsistency between the purpose referred to in subsection (1) and a provision of, or an activity authorised by, the Fish Resources Management Act 1994 that relates to aquaculture or to commercial or recreational fishing, the latter prevails.

 

(4)     Subsection (8) has effect despite anything in the Pearling Act 1990, but in the event of any other conflict or inconsistency between the purpose referred to in subsection (1) and a provision of, or an activity authorised by, the Pearling Act 1990 that relates to pearling activity, the latter prevails.

(5)     Subject to section 13D, aquaculture shall not be carried out in any area of a marine park which is classified under section 62 as —

                 (a) a sanctuary area; or

                 (b) a recreation area; or

                 (c)  a special purpose area which, or that part of such an area which, the

         Minister has declared in the classification notice to be an area where aquaculture would be incompatible with a conservation purpose specified in the classification notice, but aquaculture may be carried out, in accordance with an authorisation issued under the Fish Resources Management Act 1994, in any other area of the marine park.

(6)     Subject to section 13D, commercial fishing shall not be carried out in any area of a

          marine park which is classified under section 62 as —

                 (a) a sanctuary area; or

                 (b)  a recreation area; or

                 (c)  a special purpose area which, or that part of such an area which, the

         Minister has declared in the classification notice to be an area where commercial fishing would be incompatible with a conservation purpose specified in the classification notice, but commercial fishing may be carried out, in accordance with an authorisation issued under the Fish Resources Management Act 1994, in any other area of the marine park.

(7)     Subject to section 13D, recreational fishing shall not be carried out in any area of a marine park which is classified under section 62 as —

                 (a) a sanctuary area; or

                 (b) a recreation area which, or that part of such an area which, the Minister

                        has declared in the classification notice to be an area where recreational

         fishing would be incompatible with another recreational purpose specified in the classification  notice; or Conservation and Land Management Act 1984.

              (c)    a special purpose area which, or that part of such an area which, the

                        Minister has declared in the classification notice to be an area where

                        recreational fishing would be incompatible with a conservation purpose

                        specified in the           classification notice, but recreational fishing may be carried out, in accordance with the requirements of the Fish Resources Management Act 1994, in any other area of the marine park.

 (9)    Despite section 4(1) but subject to section 13E, exploratory drilling for, or production of, petroleum, geothermal energy resources or geothermal energy under the Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources Act 1967 or petroleum under the Petroleum (Submerged Lands) Act 1982 shall not be carried out in any area of a marine park which is classified under section 62 as —

(a)    a sanctuary area; or

(b)    a recreation area; or

(c)    a special purpose area which, or that part of such an area which, the Minister has declared in the classification notice to be an area where those activities would be Conservation and Land Management Act 1984

         incompatible with a conservation purpose specified in the classification notice, but those activities may be carried out, in accordance with those

                        Acts, in any other area of the marine park.

 

(10)   The term classification notice used in this section refers to the relevant notice under section 62(1a).

13C. Marine management areas, purpose of and permitted acts in (1aa)

In this section —

geothermal energy and geothermal energy resources have the same meanings as

they have in the Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources Act 1967.

(1)          The reservation of a marine management area shall be for the purpose of managing and protecting the marine environment so that it may be used for conservation, recreational, scientific and commercial purposes.

(2)     In subsection (1) —

              commercial purposes includes —

(a)    aquaculture, commercial fishing and pearling activity; and

(b)    mining, within the meaning of the Mining Act 1978; and

(ba) exploration for and recovery of minerals under the Offshore Minerals Act

         2003; and

(c)    seismic surveys and exploratory drilling for petroleum or geothermal energy resources; and

(d)    production of petroleum or geothermal energy, and associated activities.

(2)          Aquaculture, commercial fishing and recreational fishing may be carried out, in

accordance with the Fish Resources Management Act 1994, in a marine management area.

Fish Resources Management Act 1994

4.3 CALM and FRM Act Regulations

(a)        The CALM Regulations apply to those parts of the Conservation Estate comprising the Freehold Areas and the CALM Regulations and the FRM Act Regulations apply to those parts of the Conservation Reserve comprising the Intertidal Zone Reserves.

Marine Park Statutory Environment – Public Notices And Submissions

14.     Proposal for marine reserve, public notice of and submissions on

(1)     Public notification of a proposal to make an order under section 13(1) shall be given in accordance with subsection (2).

(1a)   Public notification of a proposal shall not be given unless —

(a) the Minister has received a report from the Marine Authority in relation to the

proposal; and

(b) the Minister for Fisheries and the Minister for Mines have approved the

      notification of the proposal.

(3B)   Notwithstanding subsection (4) each local government notified pursuant

          to subsection (3A) shall be given a reasonable time in which to prepare written

          submissions on the proposal.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

SoB Yawuru Park Council Policy 1.5.1[OMC 29 November 2012 Item 9.4.4].

There is no delegation to the Yawuru Park Council representatives.

Associated documents include:

·    Yawuru Prescribed Body Corporate Indigenous Land Use Agreement – Broome (Yawuru PBC ILUA)

·    Yawuru Area Agreement Indigenous Land Use Agreement – Broome (Yawuru Area Agreement ILUA)

·    Joint Management Agreement (JMA)

·    Assistance Agreement (AA)

 

RISK

As previously noted (SMC 10 September 2015), a further risk to this proposal is that due to the nature of the CALM ACT, any comments provided to DPAW on behalf of the Broome Community or from the Shire of Broome may not be considered in the final plan as presented (by DPaW) to Parliament for consideration and endorsement.

 

STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS 

Our People Goal – Foster a community environment that is accessible, affordable, inclusive, healthy and safe:

Affordable services and initiatives to satisfy community need

Accessible and safe community spaces

Participation in recreational activity

A healthy and safe environment

Our Place Goal – Help to protect the nature and built environment and cultural heritage of Broome whilst recognising the unique sense of the place:

Realistic and sustainable land use strategies for the Shire within state and national frameworks and in consultation with the community

A unique natural environment for the benefit and enjoyment of current and future generations

A preserved, unique and significant historical and cultural heritage of Broome

Retention and expansion of Broome’s iconic tourism assets and reputation

Our Prosperity Goal – Create the means to enable local jobs creation and lifestyle affordability for the current and future population:

Affordable and equitable services and infrastructure

Affordable land for residential, industrial, commercial and community use

Key economic development strategies for the Shire which are aligned to regional outcomes working through recognised planning and development groups/committees

Our Organisation Goal – Continually enhance the Shire’s organisational capacity to service the needs of a growing community:

Sustainable and integrated strategic and operational plans

Effective community engagement

Improved systems, processes and compliance

VOTING REQUIREMENTS

Simple Majority

 

REPORT RECOMMENDATION:

That Council:

1.       Endorses the attached Final Supplementary Submission as per Attachment G and request the Chief Executive Officer to forward the submission to the Department of Parks and Wildlife; and

2.       Request the Chief Executive Officer to write to the Kimberley Port Authority and reiterates Council’s previous Council resolution of 19 December 2013 in relation to the extent of the Proposed Marine Park in the Port Waters.

 

 

Attachments

1.

Attachment A - Yawuru_outoftown_management_plan_print_web

2.

Attachment B - Yawuru_nagulagun_marine_park_web_mike-edit

3.

Attachment C - Broome Advertiser_17 September 2015_copy advert

4.

Attachment D - SoB CEO to Minister 21 September 2015

5.

Attachment E - SoB CEO Cover to DG DPaW 25 September 2015

6.

Attachment F - Shire of Broome Initial Submission 25 September 2015

7.

Attachment G - Draft Shire of Broome Supplementary Submission

  


Item 12.4 - Shire of Broome Final Response to the Proposed Yawuru Nagulagun / Roebuck Bay Marine Park indicative joint management plan 2015 and the Yawuru Birragun Conservation Park draft management plan 2015.

 

Attachment A - Yawuru_outoftown_management_plan_print_web

 

 



























































































Item 12.4 - Shire of Broome Final Response to the Proposed Yawuru Nagulagun / Roebuck Bay Marine Park indicative joint management plan 2015 and the Yawuru Birragun Conservation Park draft management plan 2015.

 

Attachment B - Yawuru_nagulagun_marine_park_web_mike-edit

 

 





































































































Item 12.4 - Shire of Broome Final Response to the Proposed Yawuru Nagulagun / Roebuck Bay Marine Park indicative joint management plan 2015 and the Yawuru Birragun Conservation Park draft management plan 2015.

 

Attachment C - Broome Advertiser_17 September 2015_copy advert

 

 


Item 12.4 - Shire of Broome Final Response to the Proposed Yawuru Nagulagun / Roebuck Bay Marine Park indicative joint management plan 2015 and the Yawuru Birragun Conservation Park draft management plan 2015.

 

Attachment D - SoB CEO to Minister 21 September 2015

 

 


Item 12.4 - Shire of Broome Final Response to the Proposed Yawuru Nagulagun / Roebuck Bay Marine Park indicative joint management plan 2015 and the Yawuru Birragun Conservation Park draft management plan 2015.

 

Attachment E - SoB CEO Cover to DG DPaW 25 September 2015

 

 


Item 12.4 - Shire of Broome Final Response to the Proposed Yawuru Nagulagun / Roebuck Bay Marine Park indicative joint management plan 2015 and the Yawuru Birragun Conservation Park draft management plan 2015.

 

Attachment F - Shire of Broome Initial Submission 25 September 2015

 

 





Item 12.4 - Shire of Broome Final Response to the Proposed Yawuru Nagulagun / Roebuck Bay Marine Park indicative joint management plan 2015 and the Yawuru Birragun Conservation Park draft management plan 2015.

 

Attachment G - Draft Shire of Broome Supplementary Submission

 

 


Item 12.4 - Shire of Broome Final Response to the Proposed Yawuru Nagulagun / Roebuck Bay Marine Park indicative joint management plan 2015 and the Yawuru Birragun Conservation Park draft management plan 2015.

 

Attachment G - Draft Shire of Broome Supplementary Submission

 

 







Item 12.4 - Shire of Broome Final Response to the Proposed Yawuru Nagulagun / Roebuck Bay Marine Park indicative joint management plan 2015 and the Yawuru Birragun Conservation Park draft management plan 2015.

 

Attachment G - Draft Shire of Broome Supplementary Submission

 

 


Item 12.4 - Shire of Broome Final Response to the Proposed Yawuru Nagulagun / Roebuck Bay Marine Park indicative joint management plan 2015 and the Yawuru Birragun Conservation Park draft management plan 2015.

 

Attachment G - Draft Shire of Broome Supplementary Submission

 

 


AgendaOrdinary Meeting of Council 15 October 2015                                                                        Page 387 of 388

 

 

12.6       Yawuru Conservation Estate - Draft Recreation Master Plan

LOCATION/ADDRESS:                            In Town Conservation Estate and Out of Town Conservation estate

APPLICANT:                                              Nil

FILE:                                                           NAT 55; NAT55.1;NAT55.2,NAT55.4,NAT55.5

AUTHOR:                                                   Coastal Park Governance Officer

CONTRIBUTOR/S:                                    Strategic Planning Coordinator

RESPONSIBLE OFFICER:                          Director of Engineering Services

DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST:                     Nil

DATE OF REPORT:                                    10 July 2015

 

SUMMARY:        

A Draft Recreation Master Plan has been developed by the Department of Parks and Wildlife for the Yawuru Conservation Estates.  This draft Plan provides broad direction for recreation activities and facilities within the Yawuru Conservation Estate, both in, and adjacent to Broome.  

This plan generally aligns with the Proposed Yawuru Nagulagun / Roebuck Bay Marine Park indicative joint management plan 2015; and the Yawuru Birragun Conservation Park draft management plan 2015.

The Draft Recreation Master Plan is being presented to Council for endorsement of the proposed recreational nodes and activities.

 

BACKGROUND

Previous Considerations

 

 

Annual Electors Meeting

Broome Dinosaur Coast

OMC

26 February 2015

Item 9.4.8   

In Town Management Plan

SMC

12 May 2015

Item 6.4.2

OMC

21 February 2013

Item 9.2.13 

OMC

19 April 2012

Item 9.2.4

OMC

15 March 2012

Item 9.2.5

OMC

1 August 2011

Item 9.4.8

Drainage

OMC

30 April 2015

Item 9.2.4

OMC

25 September 2014

Item 9.2.3

Out of Town Management Plan

SMC

10 September 2015

Item 6.2.1

SMC

29 May 2013

Item 9.2.1

OMC

4 October 2012

Item 9.2.1

Yawuru Conservation Estate

OMC

29 October 2009

Item 9.1.1

Marine Park and Broome Port Authority Waters

OMC

09 August 2012

Item 9.2.1

 

OMC

18 July 2013

Item 9.2.1

 

OMC

17 October 2013

Item 9.2.1

BackGROUND

In total there will be four management plans developed to inform the development of the Yawuru Park Council Budgets and to inform the management principles for the following areas.

Conservation Estate Area

Voting and Tenure Responsibility 

Nagulagun (Marine Park Areas)

(Also referred to in this report as the Marine Park the subject of the Marine Park Management Plan)

Yawuru NBY and DPaW

Reserved as an A- Class Reserve.

Minyirr Buru (Townsite Areas)

Yawuru NBY and the Shire of Broome Draft Management Plan not yet finalised.

Cable Beach Intertidal Zone (currently within the Out of Town Areas).

Located approximately 600 metres north of the rocks.

Yawuru NBY, Shire of Broome and DPaW.

Draft Management Plan / tri-partite arrangements yet to be developed and is referenced as Area 25 Portion 1 & 2 ITZ Tri-partite Management Area (Yawuru PBC ILUA).

Birragun (Out-of-Town Areas)

(Also referred to in this report as the Conservation Park the subject of the Conservation Park Management Plan)

Yawuru NBY and DPaW

Held by Yawuru in Fee simple and leased to State on 99 year lease.

As detailed at SMC 10 September 2015 (Item 6.2.1), the Department of Parks and Wildlife (DPaW) has released the Proposed Yawuru Nagulagun / Roebuck Bay Marine Park indicative joint management plan 2015 and the Yawuru Birragun Conservation Park draft management plan 2015 for public comment.

The draft Recreation Master Plan provides direction for redeveloping recreation sites across all of the Yawuru Conservation Estate (YCE). All development works will consider the broader landscape and cultural values, visitor experience and perception of the place. This draft recreation plan provides for development of sites while remaining acutely aware of the existing character of the parks and the potential impacts of easier access and additional facilities. A careful balance is required to provide an appropriate experience for a diverse range of visitors in a predominantly natural setting.

The Shire of Broome is responsible for the Town site of Broome and is the joint Vesting

Authority with Yawuru RNTBC for the ILUA reserves located within the town site. It has powers and responsibilities to provide for the good governance of the district in accordance with the provisions of the Local Government Act 1995 and associated regulations and other legislation.

The Shire is also the responsible authority for the implementation and enforcement of the Broome Town Planning Scheme in accordance with the Planning and Development Act 2005. The Shire of Broome is also responsible for management of public assets including Sporting and Recreation spaces.

Existing facilities throughout the Yawuru Conservation Estate (YCE) are limited and this lack of facilities combined with the increasing population and tourism pressures is now having detrimental impacts. Facilities including signage, vehicle barriers, shelters and paths are generally out dated and require maintenance.  Visitors to the Conservation Estate mirror the annual Broome population cycle with a moderate but constant level of local use throughout the year and a sharp increase in visitation through the dry season (May – October). Visitation is dependent on access, with the In-Town Estate areas receiving the highest visitation, particularly Minyirr Park and Gantheaume Point.

Integration of the draft recreation master plan into Shire of Broome recreation planning and the release of two further draft conservation plans (Minyirr Buru and the Cable Beach Intertidal Zone) will be required to ensure that duplication of facilities and operational activities are avoided.

This Draft Recreation Master Plan is to be utilised as the operational and planning document to be aligned with the terrestrial draft management plans (draft Minyirr Buru/In-Town Conservation Estate Management Plan, and the draft Intertidal Zone draft Management Plan).  The progress of the draft In Town Conservation Estate Management Plan has been protracted with the engagement of a new consultant by the Yawuru Park Council to progress the draft plan occurring in mid July 2015.  An expected completion date of December 2015 is anticipated.

The Shire of Broome has consistently considered recreational and environmental impacts as a significant consideration in planning and progressing strategic activities when considering development of sustainable initiatives for the lasting growth of the community.

Previous considerations by the Shire of Broome inform this Officers report, and impact on the progress of the draft Recreation Master Plan, include (but are not limited) to the following Council Resolutions:

9.2.13 YAWURU CONSERVATION ESTATE – MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR IN-TOWN ESTATE (21 February 2013)

COUNCIL RESOLUTION:  (REPORT RECOMMENDATION)

Moved: Cr J Bloom Seconded: Cr M Manado

 

That Council:

 

1.   Notes the CCS Strategic report Broome Coastal Reserves Master Plan February 2013;

 

2.   Requires the Chief Executive Officer to have the CCS Strategic report Broome Coastal Reserves Master Plan February 2013 incorporated into a detailed Shire of Broome submission on the draft Yawuru In Town Reserves Management Plan.

 

9.4.8    ANNUAL ELECTORS MEETING HELD 11 DECEMBER 2014. 

Extract (1 & 3 only).

COUNCIL ENBLOC RESOLUTION:  (REPORT RECOMMENDATION 2):

That Council:

 

1.          Notes that the significance of the Broome Dinosaur Coast has been recognised and addressed in the local planning strategy and provisions are contained within the local planning scheme no 6 coastal reserve which aim to ensure that development within a coastal reserve does not have an adverse impact on the ecology, areas of aboriginal cultural or heritage significance or public use of the reserve.

 

3.          Requests the Yawuru Park Council to ensure dinosaur footprints are considered within the relevant management plans being prepared for the yawuru conservation park.

Shire officers have provided the above recommendations to the Yawuru Park Council for consideration and inclusion during the drafting of the Draft Recreation Management Plan.  The above two recommendations will be further considered in the drafting of the Minyirr Buru (In-Town) Conservation Estate Management Plan

9.2.1 YAWURU OUT-OF-TOWN CONSERVATION ESTATE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Special Meeting of Council 29 May 2013

REPORT RECOMMENDATION:

 

That Council advises the Yawuru Park Council it supports the draft Yawuru Out-of-Town Conservation Estate Management Plan 2013 and requests further consideration be given to the following matters:

 

1.        the provision for at least two beach-side recreation nodes south of Coconut Wells;

 

2.        Shire of Broome involvement in the delineation and review of dog and horse areas in the intertidal reserve;

 

3.        addressing public access through the Shire reserves;

 

4.        investigation of including additional intertidal land in the conservation estate;

 

5.        provision of appropriate vehicular access to Cable Beach;

6.        consideration of low key boat launching access.

 

 

This resolution of the SMC on 29 May 2013 has resulted in the intent for the northern inter-tidal zone which is a tri-vested management order (Shire of Broome, DPaW and Yawuru NBY) to be developed as a separate management plan.  The intent is that this draft plan will be developed by the Yawuru Park Council and will address some of the recommendations as provided by Council.  It is anticipated that a draft Plan will be available in 2016.

 

COMMENT

DPaW planning staff presented the draft Recreation Master Plan to Shire Officers at a workshop on 20 March 2015.

Shire Officers noted that the draft Recreation Master Plan will be a critical document to guide the future development of recreation facilities in the Yawuru Conservation Estate and are generally supportive of the recommendations made in the Plan.

The YCE recreation assets are vitally important to the Broome community. Their effective management is crucial to meeting community needs and aspirations.  To assist in the management of the infrastructure with the YCE, Shire Officers recommend that an Asset Management Plan be developed through a ‘whole of life’ approach, which includes preventative maintenance and asset renewal.  Any new structures should be constructed of durable materials and have low maintenance requirements; and landscaping should comprise of native plants with low water requirements.

Officers note that under Local Planning Scheme No. 6 the majority of the nodes proposed are located within the ‘Coastal’ Reserve, which extends seaward to the Low Water Mark. The purpose of the ‘Coastal’ Reserve in Clause 3.4.1 is:

To recognise and protect the environmental integrity, Aboriginal culture and landscape significance of the coastal foreshore and immediate hinterland.

The activities and facilities proposed at the various nodes are consistent with the purpose, aims and objectives of the ‘Coastal’ reserve.  The nodes that are not located within the ‘Coastal’ reserve include:

·   Demco Beach – ‘Local Road’ reserve  

·   Morgan’s Camp – ‘Town Centre’ zone  

·   Waterbank Homestead – ‘Culture and Natural Resource Use’ zone

Even though the above nodes are not within the ‘Coastal’ reserve, the proposed activities are considered appropriate.

Capital Works Schedule

This draft Recreation Master Plan has identified 10 recreation nodes and extensive walking trails within the Minyirr Buru (In-Town) Conservation Area and 16 recreation nodes within the Birrugun (Out of Town) Conservation Area. With such a large number of recreation nodes requiring fund for upgrading, a long term Capital Works Program should be developed.  To prioritise the development of the various recreation nodes, a project prioritisation assessment should be undertaken.  A cost benefit analysis should also be undertaken on each recreation node to confirm the scope of development and appropriate allocation of the joint managed capital works funds.

Officers recommend that a 5 Year YCE Capital Works Program be developed using a project prioritisation assessment and a cost benefit analysis and this Program be budgeted accordingly.

The draft YCE Recreation Master Plan identifies improvements to the various recreation nodes located both within the In Town and Out of Town Conservation Areas.  Due to very high visitor numbers, the two recreation nodes at Gantheaume Point have been identified by Shire Officers and are recommended as a very high priority for YPC Capital Works Funding.  The two recreation nodes are:-

·    Gantheaume Point Beach Access

·    Minyirr (Gantheaume Point)

Site Specific Comments

Officers have reviewed the DPaW recommendations and provided the following Officer recommendations:

 

Location

DPaW Recommendation

Shire Recommendation

IN TOWN

Simpson Beach

Minor Day Use Area

·  Consider possible inclusion of adjacent reserve to provide sufficient space for recreation facilities

·  Liaise with Broome Port Authority on site design

·  Remove parking area from pindan cliff and relocate between Port Drive and beach

·  Provide small shelters and formalised beach access

·  Rehabilitate and stabilise old parking area and dunes system

Officers support Minor Day Use Area. 

Currently car park and access track being designed.  Construction scheduled for 2015/16

 

Demco Beach

Medium Day Use Area

· Redefine parking area to increase capacity

· Review incompatible uses of area and determine management approach

· Redefine parking area to increase capacity

· Provide additional small shelters

· Interpret history of Demco meatworks and connection to broader Kimberley region

· Consider revegetation program including ‘gardgu trees’

· Provide toilet facilities

Officers support Medium Day Use Area

The proposed improvements to the parking area and surrounds are consistent with the Old Broome Development Strategy, and are supported. The area of Reserve 50978 which includes the parking area and access track is not located within the Yawuru Conservation Estate, but consider that the Shire can work together with Yawuru Park Council to improve the amenity of this area.

Burrgungun

Morgans Camp

· Consider possible inclusion of adjacent UCL, reserve and/or road reserve to provide sufficient space for Yawuru recreation facilities

· Commercial cultural activities managed by Yawuru

· Consider designated parking area

· Consider mangrove boardwalk into Dampier Creek to fishing platform lookout

· Create interpretation hub using existing buildings (Hunters House)

· Locate trailhead for walk trail to Minyirr - Gantheaume Point

· Recover artefacts including building materials and relics and undertake mapping of building footprints and previous site layout

· Remove rubbish throughout

Officers support Medium Day Use Area, fishing platform and trailhead for Minyirr Walk.

 The retention and interpretation of Morgan’s Camp is consistent with the Chinatown Development Strategy. However, modelling this area is likely to be subject to coastal inundation over the next 100 years due to rising sea levels and any permanent infrastructure installation will need to consider this.

Reddell Beach

 

 North

Medium Day Use Area

· Remove broken or unsafe structures including old fencing

· Relocate parking area back from beach and increase capacity

· Provide small shelters and formalised beach access

· Provide toilet facilities

Officers support Medium Day Use Area - If a further ‘major day use area’ is desired along this stretch of coast, Officers recommend that it be located at this site rather than at Reddell Beach (South). This area is less likely to be subject to erosion. This site is also included within Precinct 7 – Minyirr/ Gantheaume in the Local Planning Strategy, the objective of which is to “establish Precinct 7 as tourism and recreational precinct including interpretation of the dinosaur footprints and ecotourism at the race course”.

Yilagon

Minor Day Use Area

· Relocate parking area back from pindan cliff

· Provide small shelters and formalised beach access

· Rehabilitate and stabilise old parking area and dunes system

Officers support Minor Day Use Area.

South

Major Day Use Area

· Provide small shelters and formalised beach access

· Provide toilet facilities

· Rehabilitate and stabilise old parking area and dunes system where not utilised in site design

The designation of this site as a ‘major day use area’ is not supported.

This area has historically suffered substantial erosion which may jeopardise any permanent infrastructure that is installed. Additionally the site is in proximity to industrial development.

Officers recommended that this site is classified as a ‘minor day use area.’  

Minyirr Park

 

Base Camp

Major Day Use Area

· Investigate potential lease arrangement with Yawuru including commercial cultural activities

· Provide designated parking area between Gantheaume Point Road and Base camp.

To clarify that the land is in a jointly managed area, it is recommended that ‘Potential lease arrangement with Yawuru including commercial cultural activities’ be amended to ‘Potential lease arrangement with Yawuru Park Council including commercial cultural activities.’

Officers support Major Day Use Area.

Youth Camp

Medium Use Camping Area

· Provide additional toilet facilities as required

· Provide flexible spaces and structures to facilitate variety of activities

· Formalise Nagula Trail to beach

· Define unsealed two way track to Base Camp and Youth Camp

· Consider cultural education opportunities for tour operators

· Address both vehicular and walk trail approaches from Gubinge Road into Park

· Capture existing interpretive artwork and restore or replicate

The proposed Medium use camping areas and improvements to this area are supported.

It is recommended that ‘Potential lease arrangement with Yawuru including commercial cultural activities’ be amended to ‘Potential lease arrangement with Yawuru Park Council including commercial cultural activities.’

It is further recommended that the Yawuru Park Council enter into discussions with the Department of Education to investigate whether it may be feasible to relocate components of the Camp School to this site.

Lurujarri Trail

· Maintain trails as typically natural surface ‘Class 3’ and construct stair structures and trail surface modification where required over steep dune crossings.

· Install trail markers along length of trail

· Construct bough shed shelters at each beach terminus of Nagula Trails

· Continue slashing trails following positive community feedback

· Address visitor risk

· Provide safe trailheads for Nagula Trails at Gubinge Road entries into Park

Officers support Primary Walk Trail/ Lurujarri/Minyirr Trail - Primary Walk Trail.

This trail to Minyirr/Gantheaume is supported to provide additional recreational opportunities for Broome residents and visitors.

 

Nagula Trails

 

Officers support Primary Beach Access via Nagula Trails.

 Lookout and stairs have been constructed at 2 locations (July 2015).

Gantheaume Point

 

 

Major Day Use Area

· In cooperation with the Shire, determine extent of parking, interpretation and toilet facilities given current tenure boundaries

· Relocate parking area and increase capacity including overflow parking up Gantheaume Point Road

· Provide parking south west of Broome Turf Club for fishing along sandstone cliffs

· Consider location for Yawuru commercial operation

· Remove and replace existing interpretive structure and include additional  interpretation

· Remove and replace toilet facilities and increase capacity

· Consider alternatives to accessing Gantheaume Point allowing some areas to revegetate and rehabilitate

· Provide universal access path to lookout at Gantheaume Point

· Provide defined safe access to lookout in proximity to cliff edge (Class 1 or 2 wheelchair accessible)

· Provide defined route to Anastasia’s Pool and dinosaur footprints (Class 5)

· Rehabilitate and stabilise eroded areas and address drainage

· Address cliff risks through relocating access, fencing and signage and consider possible designated lookouts or viewing areas along Broome sandstone cliffs

· Undertake geotechnical assessment and DEC VRM inspection of the area

· Remove broken or unsafe structures including old fencing

· Interpret other interpretive elements including Anastasia’s Pool, lighthouse, old fireplace in parking area

Officers support Major Day Use Area and recommend Major Improvements to Area.

Officers recommend a review of Gantheaume Point road alignment (north of turf club) – to relocate the road into the road reserve.

 

 Beach Access

Major Day Use Area

· Formalise parking area above beach

· Provide shade shelters and toilet facilities

· Formalise beach access

· Replace management and interpretation signage

· Provide dedicated formalised horse access if required

· Potential major parking area for boat trailers and additional vehicles if required

· Provide designated crossing points from proposed RAC Wilderness Retreat

Officers support Major Day Use Area and formalised beach access for vehicles. 

Officers recommend major improvements to the area including formalised beach access for vehicles, pedestrians and horses.

Officers recommend a land area of 7500m2 (approximately) be set aside for the Fishing Club and car/trailer parking.

 

 Walk Trails

Maintain trails as typically natural surface ‘Class 3’ and construct stair structures and trail surface modification where required over steep dune crossings.

Officers support walk trail from Jetties to Gantheaume Pt

Future Dual Use Path Along Gantheaume Pt Rd – Officers Support as included in Shire Pathways Plan

The walk trail between the jetties is consistent with the Chinatown Development Strategy and Old Broome Development Strategy, and the extension of this trail to Minyirr/Gantheaume is supported to provide additional recreational opportunities for Broome residents and visitors.

· Kavite Rd (South)

· Create larger parking area back from beach and increase capacity

· Provide small shelters and formalised beach access

· Provide toilet facilities

· Rehabilitate and stabilise old parking area and dunes system where not utilised

· in site design

· Consider possible inclusion of adjacent road reserve to provide sufficient space for recreation facilities

· New access road from realigned Kavite Road

· Track multiplication due to wet season flooding on Kavite Road

Realignment of Kavite Rd from Port Drive to north of Redell Beach South node is not supported.

The realignment of the southern portion of Kavite Road, whilst in the draft Local Planning Strategy, was not included in the final Local Planning Strategy as the proposed intersection with Port Drive was not supported by Main Roads WA.

Officers recommend the notation to ‘remove or relocate’ this section of road should be removed from the Master Plan.

Kavite Rd (North)

· Track multiplication due to wet season flooding on Kavite Road.

· Beach access is dangerous and requires a scramble down pindan cliffs.

 

Officers support the closure of Kavite Road between Gantheaum Point Road and Redell Beach North Node.

Also support realignment of Kavite road to east of turf club from Gantheaume Pt Rd to Reddell Beach North Node.

OUT OF TOWN

Wirrjinmirr (Willie Creek)

Wirrjinmirr

Medium Day Use Area

· Define parking area behind fore dune on flat ground

· Remove and rehabilitate tracks at eastern end

· Define one sustainable vehicle access to beach

· Provide multiple pedestrian access tracks from parking area to beach

· Consider shade shelters and toilet

· Consider providing low key interpretation

· Prevent vehicle access on limestone rock areas

Officers support Medium Day Use Area and vehicle access to beach.

 

Flat Rock

Minor Day Use Area

· Define parking area above north rock shelf

· Close north rock shelf to vehicles and provide designated pedestrian access track

· Maintain vehicle access to south rock shelf (interim measure)

· Upgrade track, address drainage and stabilise banks south of Flat Rock

Officers support Minor Day Use Area.

 

Gidi Gidi/

Sand Bank

Minor Day Use Area

· Define parking area back from foredune

· Provide suitable barriers to define vehicle access

· Provide designated vehicle access track to beach

· Prevent vehicle access on limestone rock areas

Officers support Minor Day Use Area and vehicle access to beach.

Warnangarri /Limestone

Minor Day Use Area

· Define parking area back from limestone ledge

· Consider providing low key interpretation

· Provide designated access track

· Prevent vehicle access on limestone rock areas

Officers support Minor Day Use Area.  

 

 

Nimilarragan

Minor Day Use Area

· Define parking area at southern end of dam wall

· Undertake remedial works to dam wall to address erosion and trampling

· (horses)

· Close dam wall to vehicles and define walk trail

· Install gate access to track from Cape Leveque Road

· Access through cultural eco tours only. Site closed to general public

Officers support Minor Day Use Area.

Officers recommend keep site open to public.

Waterbank

Homestead

Major Day Use Area

· Consider need for heritage assessment and survey

· Restore and maintain structures including buildings, stockyards and other elements

· Define parking areas and access throughout Homestead precinct

· Provide adequate toilet facilities

· Provide interpretation hub within precinct including static signage

· Provide facilities for cultural tourism activities such as performance spaces and cooking facilities

· This site may be used for overnight camping associated with cultural eco tourism activities

· This site may be a Yawuru only area for cultural use

Officers support Major Day Use Area and over night camping.

 

Officers recommend to keep open to public (not a Yawuru only area).

 

General

The Shire’s Local Planning Strategy identifies Willie Creek as a ‘Major Tourism Node’ which may ultimately have the potential to accommodate up to 500 people. The creation of recreation nodes in this area will complement this designation and is supported.

Officers recommend that access to the Willie Creek Recreation Nodes is maintained.  This will require access through a Shire Gravel Reserve and access through a Yawuru Cultural Protection Prohibited Access Zone(s)

 

Coconut Well

Ngunun-

gurrukun

Major Day Use Area

· Provide 2WD access from Lawrence Road (possibly sealed)

· Provide parking area on flat, stable country

· Provide multiple shade shelters

· Provide toilet facilites

· Install interpretation signage

· Provide pedestrian access tracks to beach and walk trail to Denham Road

Officers support Major Day Use Area and beach access for vehicles

Officers support access to site to be upgraded to a sealed road standard (2WD)

Officers support interim temporary beach access via Denham Rd until Major Day Use Area constructed. Denham Rd scheduled to be sealed by Shire in Oct 2015.

Support walk trail to beach from Denham Rd and to Ngunungurrukun from Denham Rd.

Niyamarri

Medium Day Use Area

· Provide spur road from McGuigan Road

· Provide shade shelters and toilets

· Create defined parking area behind foredune

· Provide beach access track and lookout

· Install interpretation signage.

Officers support this site as Medium Day Use and recommend beach vehicle access.

The inclusion of a node at this site is supported. It is recommended that consideration be given to allowing vehicle access to the beach in this location, if clear signage is posted to deter driving on the boggy beach to the north. Signage should also clearly state that vehicle access is to be setback from the base of the dunes so not to impact on turtle nesting sites. The removal of tracks to the north of this site is supported.

Niyamarri

(alternative sites)

 

Access to site looks reasonable as along southern side of rural block with existing track to beach.  Also suitable for vehicles to use to access beach.

Officers support this site as Medium Day Use and recommend vehicle access to beach.

General:  Council has resolved to have 2 recreation nodes south of Coconut Wells. Vehicle access to the beach on the southern side of Coconut Wells (either Niyamarri North or Niyamarri South) shall be provided.  The draft Birrugun (Out of Town) Management Plan advises that investigation will be required to determine best location for recreation site.

Crab Creek

Man-galagun Road Entry

· Create designated information bay parallel with Man-galagun Road

· Install shelter with orientation, management and interpretation signage

· Manage access west into Kunin and east to Gubanyunya

Officers support this site as an Information Bay.

Buga Wamba

Medium Day Use Area

· Spur road from new Man-galagun Road alignment

· Define parking area back from pindan cliff

· Provide defined access tracks from parking area to beach

· Provide shade shelters and toilet

Officers support this site as Medium Day Use Area.

NOTE: This site is not included in Birrugun (Out of Town) Management Plan.

Kadji Rock

Medium Day Use Area

· Spur road from new Man-galagun Road alignment

· Define parking area back from pindan cliff

· Provide defined access tracks from parking area to beach

· Provide shade shelters and toilet

Officers support this site as Medium Day Use Area.

 

Black Rock

Medium Day Use Area

· Define parking area back from pindan cliff

· Provide defined access tracks from parking area to beach

· Provide lookout area

· Spur road from new Man-galagun Road alignment

· Provide interpretation signage

Officers support this site as Medium Day Use Area.

 

Fall Point

Major Day Use Area

· Spur road from new Crab Creek Road alignment

· Define parking area back from pindan cliff

· Provide defined access tracks from parking area to beach

· Provide boat launching facility if practicable

· Provide shade shelters, toilet and interpretive signage

· Consider relocating Broome Bird Observatory lookout deck

Officers support this site as Major Day Use Area and for boat launching/vehicle beach access.

 

Sabu Rock/ Blackberry Tree

Minor Day Use Area

· Define parking area back from pindan cliff

· Provide defined access track from parking area to beach

Officers support this site as Minor Day Use Area.

 

Bandurr Bandurr

Medium Day Use Area

· Define parking area and terminus to Man-galagun Road

· Provide defined pedestrian access tracks to Little Crab Creek

· Provide interpretation and trailhead to Northern Shore Walk Trail

· Provide shade shelters and toilet

· Close Little Crab Creek to boat launching

Officers support this site as Medium Day Use Area.

NOTE: This site is not included in Birrugun (Out of Town) Management Plan.

 

 

 

Man-galagun/

Mirda

Medium Day Use Area

· Define parking area and terminus to Man-galagun Road

· Provide defined pedestrian access tracks to Little Crab Creek

· Provide interpretation and trailhead to Northern Shore Walk Trail

· Provide shade shelters and toilet

· Close Little Crab Creek to boat launching

Officers support this site as Medium Day Use Area..

 

 

 

General:  Shire Officers support the Man-galagun Road realignment away from the pindan cliffs and the northern shore walking trail.

 

CONSULTATION

Yawuru Registered Native Title Body Corporate

Department of Parks and Wildlife WA

STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT

Shire of Broome Local Planning Scheme No. 6

3.4 Coastal Reserve.  3.4.1 Purpose:

To recognise and protect the environmental integrity, Aboriginal culture and landscape significance of the coastal foreshore and immediate hinterland. Notwithstanding anything in the Scheme or on the maps, the Coastal Reserve extends seaward to the Low Water Mark and includes the offshore islands.

Conservation and Land Management Act 1984 (WA) (Conservation Commission)

Division 3 — Marine reserves:

13A. Marine nature reserves, purpose of and prohibited acts in

(1)     The reservation of a marine nature reserve shall be for —

                 (a) the conservation and restoration of the natural environment; and

                 (b) the protection, care and study of indigenous flora and fauna; and

                 (c) the preservation of any feature of archaeological, historic or scientific

                        interest.

13B. Marine parks, purpose of and prohibited acts in

(1)     The reservation of a marine park shall be for the purpose of allowing only that level of recreational and commercial activity which is consistent with the proper conservation and restoration of the natural environment, the protection of indigenous flora and fauna and the preservation of any feature of archaeological, historic or scientific interest.

(2)     As soon as practicable after the reservation of a marine park the Minister shall classify the park under section 62, or divide the park into areas and classify each area under section 62, as —

                 (a) a general use area; or

                 (b) a sanctuary area; or

                 (c) a recreation area; or

                 (d) a special purpose area,

          in accordance with a proposal for the classification publicly notified in  accordance with section 14, modified as the Minister thinks fit to give effect to submissions made under section 14.

Local Government Act 1995

Land Administration Act 1997 - Section 49

“49: Management plan for managed reserve

(1)         A management body may submit to the Minister for his or her approval a plan for the development, management and use of the Crown land in its managed reserve for the purpose of that managed reserve.

(2)         The Minister may request a management body or proposed management body to submit to the Minister in an approved form, within such period as is specified in that request, for his or her approval a plan for the development, management and use of the Crown land in the managed reserve of the management body for the purpose of that managed reserve.

(3)         A management body must, before submitting a plan to the Minister under subsection (1) or in response to a request under subsection (2) —

(a)        consider any conservation, environmental or heritage issues relevant to the development, management or use of the Crown land in its managed reserve for the purpose of that managed reserve; and

(b)        incorporate in the plan a statement that it has considered those issues in drawing up the plan.

(4)         If a management body submits a plan to the Minister under subsection (1) or in response to a request under subsection (2) and the Minister approves that plan and notifies the management body of that fact, the management body may develop, manage and use the Crown land concerned —

(a)        in accordance with the plan; or

(b)        if the Minister approves a variation of the plan, in accordance with the plan as varied.”

Conservation and Land Management Act 1984 (WA) (Conservation Commission)

CALM Act (Executive Body)

Assistance Agreement (AA) - Section 33(1) (f) CALM Act 1984 (WA)

“33 .  CEO, functions of

(1)         The functions of the CEO are, subject to the direction and control of the Minister — (f) to provide advice to, or undertake work for or jointly with, and to supply services or facilities to, any department, public or private body or other person, whether in the State or elsewhere if the Minister is of the opinion that the provision of that advice or the undertaking of that work is in the public interest; “

Marine Parks and Reserves Authority (Section 26A of the CALM Act - Marine Authority)

Dog Act 1976

Cat Act 2011

Control of Vehicles (Off-road Areas) Act 1978

Local Government Grants Act 1978

Dog Regulations 1976

Cat Regulations 2012

Control of Vehicles (Off-road Areas) Regulations 1979

ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS

·    Proposed Yawuru Nagulagun / Roebuck Bay Marine Park indicative joint management plan 2015;

·    Yawuru Birragun Conservation Park draft management plan 2015;

·    Yawuru Prescribed Body Corporate Indigenous Land Use Agreement – Broome (Yawuru PBC ILUA), and the

·    Yawuru Area Agreement Indigenous Land Use Agreement – Broome (Yawuru AA  ILUA)

Joint Management Agreement (JMA)

Assistance Agreement (AA)

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

SoB Yawuru Park Council Policy 1.5.1[OMC 29 November 2012 Item 9.4.4].

·    There is no delegation to the Yawuru Park Council representatives.

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

Funding for the preparation of the draft Recreational Management Plan and capital works is sourced from the Yawuru Trust Account.  There are no Shire budget allocations to progress the draft recreation master plan and YCE capital works projects.

DPaW has proposed the following site specific capital works projects in the draft 2015/16 YCE Budget. It should be noted that the YPC has yet to adopt the draft 2015/16 YCE Budget.

 

 

 

In Town – approximately $ 450,561.00

Tenure

Description

Cost

In Town

Site Improvement - Simpson Beach 

200,000

In Town

Park Track / Trail Maintenance - Minyirr Trail 'Jack Matting' etc

12,125

In Town

Management Signage - standard management signage across parks

9,256

In Town

Capital Works - Minyirr Park Stairs & Lookout (carry over from 14/15)

229,180

 

Out of Town - approximately $ 971,376

Tenure

Description

Cost

Out of Town

Vehicle Access - Man-galagun Track maintenance / repairs

13,500

Out of Town

Site Improvement - Gurlbanwila (Dog Rocks)

971,376

Out of Town

Management Signage - standard management signage across parks

9,254

 

The capital works projects as noted above will require the development of project plans prior for approval by the Yawuru Park Council.

RISK

The draft Recreation Master Plan is a critical document to guide the future development of recreation facilities in the Yawuru Conservation Estate.  If the draft Plan is not endorsed by Council, it is ‘Likely’ that there will be a ‘Major’ consequence to the development of recreation sites within the YCE (i.e. sites developed in an uncoordinated manner) resulting in a ‘High Risk’ to the Shire.  This risk to the Shire can be reduced to ‘Low’, if the draft Recreation Master Plan is endorsed by Council.

STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS  

Our People Goal – Foster a community environment that is accessible, affordable, inclusive, healthy and safe:

Affordable services and initiatives to satisfy community need

Accessible and safe community spaces

Participation in recreational activity

A healthy and safe environment

Our Place Goal – Help to protect the nature and built environment and cultural heritage of Broome whilst recognising the unique sense of the place:

A built environment that reflects arid tropical climate design principles and historical built form

A unique natural environment for the benefit and enjoyment of current and future generations

A preserved, unique and significant historical and cultural heritage of Broome

Retention and expansion of Broome’s iconic tourism assets and reputation

Best practice asset management to optimise Shires’ infrastructure whilst minimising life cycle costs.

Our Prosperity Goal – Create the means to enable local jobs creation and lifestyle affordability for the current and future population:

Affordable and equitable services and infrastructure

Our Organisation Goal – Continually enhance the Shire’s organisational capacity to service the needs of a growing community:

Sustainable and integrated strategic and operational plans

Responsible resource allocation

 

VOTING REQUIREMENTS

Simple Majority

 

REPORT RECOMMENDATION:

That Council:

1.   Endorses the Yawuru Conservation Estate Draft Recreation Master Plan subject to the following site specific amendments:

 

a.    Gantheaume Point Beach Access Site shall include formalised beach

       access for vehicles, pedestrians and horses;

b.    Kavite Rd Realignment (south) is not supported and should be removed;

c.    Two recreation nodes with at least one vehicle access point to the beach shall be provided at the Niyamarri (south of Coconut Well);

d.    Access to the Willie Creek Recreation Sites shall be allowed through the Yawuru Cultural Protection Prohibited Access Zone as shown in the Draft Yawuru Birragun Conservation Park draft management plan 2015;

e.    Confirmation that the Buga Wamba and Bandurr Bandurr Sites are not included in the Yawuru Birragun Conservation Park draft management plan 2015 and should be removed;

f.     The Nimilarragan Site is kept open to the public;

g.    The Waterbank Homestead Site is to be kept open to the public;

h.    The Redell Beach (south) site is a ‘minor day use’ area;

i.      For Base Camp and Youth Camp, ‘Potential lease arrangement with Yawuru including commercial cultural activities’ should be replaced with ‘Potential lease arrangements with Yawuru Park Council including commercial cultural activities’.  

 

2.   Requests the Yawuru Park Council to:-

 

a.    Set aside an area of 7500 sq.m at Gantheaume Point Beach Access Site for the Fishing Club and Car/Trailer Parking;

b.    Enter into discussions with Department of Education regarding the possible relocation of the Camp School to Youth Camp;

c.    Undertake a review of the location of the section of Gantheaume Point Road to the north west of the Turf Club, as the road is currently not located within the road reserve;  

d.    Develop an Asset Management Plan for the Yawuru Conservation Estate through a ‘whole of life’ approach;

e.    Develop a 5 year Yawuru Conservation Estate Capital Works Program using a project prioritisation assessment and a cost benefit analysis, and that this Program be budgeted accordingly;

f.     Give a high priority to the improvement of recreation facilities at Gantheaume Point and Gantheaume Point Beach Access Sites.

 

3.   Authorises its delegates to inform the Yawuru Park Council of this resolution.

 

Attachments

1.

Attachment A_DRAFT_DEC_YAWURU PARKS REC Plan_April_2013

2.

Attachment B_YAWURU PARKS REC MAPS _Eight Maps

  


Item 12.6 - Yawuru Conservation Estate - Draft Recreation Master Plan

Attachment A_DRAFT_DEC_YAWURU PARKS REC Plan_April_2013

 

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Item 12.6 - Yawuru Conservation Estate - Draft Recreation Master Plan

Attachment B_YAWURU PARKS REC MAPS _Eight Maps